Russian term
Суточная потребность человека в фосфоре
Non-PRO (1): Susan Welsh
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Daily adult phosphorous requirement
agree |
Aleksandra Kleschina
30 mins
|
Thank you, Aleksandra
|
|
agree |
Susan Welsh
1 hr
|
Thank you, Susan
|
|
agree |
Natalia Volkova
6 hrs
|
Thank you, Natalia
|
|
agree |
natalia gavrile
6 hrs
|
Thank you, Natalia
|
daily phosphorus requirement of a human
disagree |
Susan Welsh
: Not "human," unless you are comparing people with animals for some reason. See Donald's answer.
2 hrs
|
Daily nutritional needs for adults in phosphorus
This section provides information to help teach about nutritional needs
disagree |
Susan Welsh
: wrong syntax - not "in phosphorus" = see Donald's answer
5 hrs
|
Susan, thanks. Need such corrections to improve my skills.
|
recommended daily phosphorus intake
Человека лучше вообще убрать, т.к. из контекста понятно, что это не для животных.
Discussion