Italian term
di cui
XXX imputato del delitto di cui all'art XXX cp
Il mio dilemma è su "di cui" che tradurrei:
XXX defendant of crime subject to art.XXX of the penal code
Oppure è meglio where of?
Grazie
| 5 +6 | under |
simon tanner
|
| 3 | (E&W Indictment: pursuant and) contrary to > |
Adrian MM. (X)
|
Apr 13, 2016 07:11: changed "Kudoz queue" from "In queue" to "Public"
Apr 13, 2016 08:42: Yana Dovgopol changed "Vetting" from "Needs Vetting" to "Vet OK"
Non-PRO (1): James (Jim) Davis
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Italy
law, philosophy & art history specialist
Native in: English
Works in: Italian to English, English
under
as seen here: http://www.sia.homeoffice.gov.uk/Pages/enforcement-offences....
but very common
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 hrs (2016-04-13 11:40:42 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
and imputato here would be "charged with", by the way
(E&W Indictment: pursuant and) contrary to >
'... who is charged as follows: going equipped etc. ... contrary to...of the xxx Act).
So, as per Angelina B.:
.. charged with a/the criminal (BrE) offence > (AmE) offense > contrary to....
E&W: Indictment STATEMENT OF OFFENCE Going equipped for theft [or burglary], contrary to section 25 of the Theft Act 1968. PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
Something went wrong...