Glossary entry (derived from question below)
German term or phrase:
Literaturbeobachtung
English translation:
literature surveillance
German term
Costa Rica
ENDE: IT, Blockchain, Marketing
Native in: German (Variant: Germany) 
Works in: English to German, German to English
Literaturbeobachtung
"Als maßgebliche Quelle zur ***Literaturbeobachtung*** nutzt die [XXXX] die pubmed-Datenbanken der NCBI (The National Center for Biotechnology Information)."
Vielen Dank!
| 4 | literature surveillance |
uyuni
|
| 3 +7 | literature search |
Donald Jacobson
|
| 3 | literature survey |
Anne Schulz
|
| 3 | monitoring (reviewing) the professional literature |
YorickJenkins
|
Feb 17, 2015 14:19: rainerc (X) changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
PRO (1): Lancashireman
Non-PRO (3): philgoddard, Anne Schulz, rainerc (X)
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
literature surveillance
Systematic Literature Surveillance:
Systematic Literature Surveillance is conducted using many journals, journal review services, systematic review collections, guideline collections and other sources considered relevant to a point-of-care clinical reference.
http://health.ebsco.com/about/editorial
Using systematic literature surveillance
Two important EBM tools are systematic reviews and an activity known as systematic literature surveillance....
Systematic literature surveillance, by contrast, starts with the evidence and uses explicit, protocol-based methods to select, evaluate, and synthesize new research information.
http://www.jfponline.com/home/article/using-systematic-liter...
"Scanning/screening/monitoring" sind andere Vokabeln, die mir noch dazu einfallen.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 hrs (2015-02-17 07:52:25 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
To provide practicing clinicians with the best current evidence, more comprehensive and systematic literature surveillance efforts are needed.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521514/
United States
Neuropsychiatrist(MD) German(MA)
Native in: English (Variant: US)
Works in: German to English, Russian to English, Swedish to English
literature search
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 31 mins (2015-02-16 19:27:21 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
[PDF]Risikoabschätzung von Nanomaterialien aus ... - Nanopartikel.info
nanopartikel.info/.../nanoGEM-Abschluss...
vor dem Hintergrund der NanoGEM-internen Ergebnisse. Systematische Literaturrecherche/Literaturbeobachtung.
| Vielen Dank für deine Hilfe, auch an all die Unterstützer deines Vorschlags, aber ich fand uyunis Referenzen überzeugender. Entschuldige bitte, ben |
| agree |
philgoddard
: Or review.
34 mins
|
|
Thanks, Phil!
|
|
| agree |
BrigitteHilgner
36 mins
|
|
Thanks, Brigitte!
|
|
| agree |
Jacek Konopka
13 hrs
|
|
Thanks, Jacek!
|
|
| agree |
PPaulus
: Agree with phil, literature review would be a good alternative :-)
14 hrs
|
|
thanks, PPaulus!
|
|
| agree |
Gudrun Maydorn (X)
: with Phil
17 hrs
|
|
Thank you, Gudrun!
|
|
| agree |
Harald Moelzer (medical-translator)
18 hrs
|
|
thanks, Harald!
|
|
| agree |
rainerc (X)
19 hrs
|
|
Thanks, rainerc!
|
literature survey
monitoring (reviewing) the professional literature
| Thanks for your help, Yorick! |
Something went wrong...