Glossary entry

Swedish term or phrase:

förvärvarens möjlighet

English translation:

the acquirer's means

Added to glossary by Anna Herbst
Oct 17, 2013 22:51
10 yrs ago
Swedish term

förvärvarens möjlighet

Non-PRO Swedish to English Law/Patents Law: Contract(s) mineral laws
Medgivande får lämnas om de krav som anges är uppfyllda i fråga om förvärvarens möjlighet, avsikt och lämplighet avseende undersökningsarbeten
Change log

Oct 18, 2013 07:43: Christopher Schröder changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"

Oct 29, 2013 12:14: Anna Herbst Created KOG entry

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

PRO (3): Charlesp, Adrian MM. (X), Deane Goltermann

Non-PRO (3): Anna Herbst, Madeleine MacRae Klintebo, Christopher Schröder

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Discussion

Mel Willetts (X) (asker) Oct 22, 2013:
Charlesp I am slightly puzzled as well to be honest, and I am reluctant to close the question down as I believe the chosen answer deserves pro points
Charlesp Oct 22, 2013:
Why was this voted non-pro? Why was this voted non-pro, one might ask, in light of the difficulity and various opinions offered.
It clearly is unclear and requires interpretation.
Deane Goltermann Oct 19, 2013:
@ ability vs. capability vs. means As dictionaries disagree with each other so can we disagree between us. In this case I blame the Swe usage of 'möjlighet' in the context, and would suggest 'förmåga' is the better word -- practically and linguistically. One way to double-check is to compare dictionary definitions in both directions. When I check 'ability' and 'capability' to Swe, I get 'förmåga' at the top of the list of 'possibilities' and möjlighet farther down the listing of alternatives. Going the other way, as in this case, 'möjlighet' often has both abilities and capabilities as suggestions, but I haven't seen 'means'.

On the practical side, in connection with 'acquirer' and 'acquirer's', I simply see a huge difference in hits in favour of 'ability' over capability, and this beats 'means' by a lot. In practice, as well, I see means as one component in an overall business assessment of a company's capability to perform its undertakings in a contract or concession.

Proposed translations

2 hrs
Selected

the acquirer's means

Simple translation

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 hrs (2013-10-18 06:40:55 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

möjlighet = means, possibility, prospect, opportunity.... but NOT ability.
Peer comment(s):

neutral Christopher Schröder : It all amounts to much the same thing IMHO
6 hrs
neutral Charlesp : I'ts possible, yet less likely that it means means.
4 days
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+3
6 hrs

the acquirer's ability

...förvärvarens möjlighet, avsikt och lämplighet avseende undersökningsarbeten = ... the acquirer's ability, intention and suitability for exploration work.
Peer comment(s):

agree Deane Goltermann : Personally, I like 'capability', but it seems 'ability' is much more common, and more so than 'means', as well.
1 hr
Thanks, Deane.
disagree Anna Herbst : Möjlighet is neither "ability" nor, as Deane suggests, "capability". (And I thought this one was really straightforward...)
1 hr
agree Christopher Schröder
2 hrs
Thanks, Chris S.
agree LilianNekipelov : I agree. Or the purchaser's ability to do X.
6 hrs
Thanks, LilianBNekipelo. Yes, The Mining Inspector agrees to transfer the exploration license, after verifying the ability, intenstion and suitability of the acquirer for mining exploration work.
agree Charlesp : If plain language was sought, I'd go with this.
4 days
Thanks, Charlesp.
Something went wrong...
+1
7 hrs

concession grantee's wherewithal

Not sure what the context is - förvärvare of what/the concession perhaps - or the problem is: maybe möjlighet.

(Cap)ability begs the question of what, whereas the 'well-known' term of wherewithal encompasses both ability, means, focus and energy.
Example sentence:

The concession conferred on the grantees the sole rights to mine throughout Lobengula's country. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudd_Concession‎

Peer comment(s):

neutral Anna Herbst : Too many assumptions for my liking. There is no hint in the Swedish text that the acquirer is in fact a "concession grantee", they could just as well be the buyer or lessee. "Wherewithal" is generally used with money; not so "möjligheter".
26 mins
OK. But acquirer sound like a concessionary rather than a tarnsferee. Point taken about wherewithal thoguh the PMs at my ex-inhouse TC/trans. agency used to ask the typists, figuratively, if they had the 'wherewithal' to type up translation jobs.
neutral LilianNekipelov : Not really, at least in AE.
5 hrs
Dziekuje barzo, alla the asker is 'split' between Surrey/the UK and Sweden.
agree Charlesp : nice. But obviously written by a lawyer!
4 days
Thanks for your vote of confidence.
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search