Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
Principio de Prevención
English translation:
(Court) First Seised Rule
Added to glossary by
Adrian MM.
May 31, 2020 14:23
3 yrs ago
38 viewers *
Spanish term
Principio de Prevención
Spanish to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
HCCH 2019 Judgments Conve
This is a section of the Argentine Civil and Commercial Procedural Code:
Código Procesal Civil y Comercial de Argentina.
CAPITULO II - ACUMULACION DE PROCESOS
PROCEDENCIA
Art. 188. - Procederá la acumulación de procesos cuando hubiere sido admisible la acumulación subjetiva de acciones de conformidad con lo prescripto en el artículo 88 y, en general, siempre que la sentencia que haya de dictarse en uno de ellos pudiere producir efectos de cosa juzgada en otro u otros.
Se requerirá, además:
1) Que los procesos se encuentren en la misma instancia.
2) Que el juez a quien corresponda entender en los procesos acumulados sea competente por razón de la materia. A los efectos de este inciso no se considerarán distintas las materias civil y comercial.
3) Que puedan sustanciarse los mismos trámites. Sin embargo, podrán acumularse DOS (2) o más procesos de conocimiento, o DOS (2) o más procesos de ejecución sujetos a distintos trámites, cuando su acumulación resultare indispensable en razón de concurrir la circunstancia prevista en la última parte del primer párrafo. En tal caso, el juez determinará el procedimiento que corresponde imprimir al juicio acumulado.
4) Que el estado de las causas permita su sustanciación conjunta, sin producir demora perjudicial e injustificada en el trámite del o de los que estuvieren más avanzados.
`*****PRINCIPIO DE PREVENCION*****
Art. 189. - La acumulación se hará sobre el expediente en el que primero se hubiese notificado la demanda. Si los jueces intervinientes en los procesos tuvieren distinta competencia por razón del monto, la acumulación se hará sobre el de mayor cuantía.
MODO Y OPORTUNIDAD DE DISPONERSE
Art. 190. - La acumulación se ordenará de oficio, o a petición de parte formulada al contestar la demanda o, posteriormente, por incidente que podrá promoverse en cualquier instancia o etapa del proceso, hasta el momento de quedar en estado de sentencia, siempre que fuere admisible con arreglo a lo que dispone el artículo 188 inciso 4.
RESOLUCION DEL INCIDENTE
Art. 191. - El incidente podrá plantearse ante el juez que debe conocer en definitiva o ante el que debe remitir el expediente.
En el primer caso, el juez conferirá traslado a los otros litigantes, y si considerare fundada la petición solicitará el otro u otros expedientes, expresando los fundamentos de su pedido. Recibidos, dictará sin más trámite resolución, contra la cual no habrá recurso y la hará conocer a los juzgados donde tramitaban los procesos.
En el segundo caso, dará traslado a los otros litigantes, y si considerare procedente la acumulación remitirá el expediente al otro juez, o bien le pedirá la remisión del que tuviere en trámite, si entendiese que la acumulación debe efectuarse sobre el que se sustancia ante su juzgado, expresando los motivos en que se funda. En ambos supuestos la resolución será inapelable.
Si se declarase improcedente el pedido, la resolución será apelable.
CONFLICTO DE ACUMULACION
Art. 192. - Sea que la acumulación se hubiese dispuesto a pedido de parte o de oficio, si el juez requerido no accediere, deberá elevar el expediente a la cámara que constituya su alzada; ésta, sin sustanciación alguna, resolverá en definitiva si la acumulación es procedente.
SUSPENSION DE TRAMITES
Art. 193. - El curso de todos los procesos se suspenderá, si tramitasen ante un mismo juez, desde que se promoviere la cuestión. Si tramitasen ante jueces distintos, desde que se comunicare el pedido de acumulación al juez respectivo. Exceptúanse las medidas o diligencias de cuya omisión pudiere resultar perjuicio.
SENTENCIA UNICA
Art. 194. - Los procesos acumulados se sustanciarán y fallarán conjuntamente, pero si el trámite resultare dificultoso por la naturaleza de las cuestiones planteadas, podrá el juez disponer, sin recurso, que cada proceso se sustancie por separado, dictando una sola sentencia.
Código Procesal Civil y Comercial de Argentina.
CAPITULO II - ACUMULACION DE PROCESOS
PROCEDENCIA
Art. 188. - Procederá la acumulación de procesos cuando hubiere sido admisible la acumulación subjetiva de acciones de conformidad con lo prescripto en el artículo 88 y, en general, siempre que la sentencia que haya de dictarse en uno de ellos pudiere producir efectos de cosa juzgada en otro u otros.
Se requerirá, además:
1) Que los procesos se encuentren en la misma instancia.
2) Que el juez a quien corresponda entender en los procesos acumulados sea competente por razón de la materia. A los efectos de este inciso no se considerarán distintas las materias civil y comercial.
3) Que puedan sustanciarse los mismos trámites. Sin embargo, podrán acumularse DOS (2) o más procesos de conocimiento, o DOS (2) o más procesos de ejecución sujetos a distintos trámites, cuando su acumulación resultare indispensable en razón de concurrir la circunstancia prevista en la última parte del primer párrafo. En tal caso, el juez determinará el procedimiento que corresponde imprimir al juicio acumulado.
4) Que el estado de las causas permita su sustanciación conjunta, sin producir demora perjudicial e injustificada en el trámite del o de los que estuvieren más avanzados.
`*****PRINCIPIO DE PREVENCION*****
Art. 189. - La acumulación se hará sobre el expediente en el que primero se hubiese notificado la demanda. Si los jueces intervinientes en los procesos tuvieren distinta competencia por razón del monto, la acumulación se hará sobre el de mayor cuantía.
MODO Y OPORTUNIDAD DE DISPONERSE
Art. 190. - La acumulación se ordenará de oficio, o a petición de parte formulada al contestar la demanda o, posteriormente, por incidente que podrá promoverse en cualquier instancia o etapa del proceso, hasta el momento de quedar en estado de sentencia, siempre que fuere admisible con arreglo a lo que dispone el artículo 188 inciso 4.
RESOLUCION DEL INCIDENTE
Art. 191. - El incidente podrá plantearse ante el juez que debe conocer en definitiva o ante el que debe remitir el expediente.
En el primer caso, el juez conferirá traslado a los otros litigantes, y si considerare fundada la petición solicitará el otro u otros expedientes, expresando los fundamentos de su pedido. Recibidos, dictará sin más trámite resolución, contra la cual no habrá recurso y la hará conocer a los juzgados donde tramitaban los procesos.
En el segundo caso, dará traslado a los otros litigantes, y si considerare procedente la acumulación remitirá el expediente al otro juez, o bien le pedirá la remisión del que tuviere en trámite, si entendiese que la acumulación debe efectuarse sobre el que se sustancia ante su juzgado, expresando los motivos en que se funda. En ambos supuestos la resolución será inapelable.
Si se declarase improcedente el pedido, la resolución será apelable.
CONFLICTO DE ACUMULACION
Art. 192. - Sea que la acumulación se hubiese dispuesto a pedido de parte o de oficio, si el juez requerido no accediere, deberá elevar el expediente a la cámara que constituya su alzada; ésta, sin sustanciación alguna, resolverá en definitiva si la acumulación es procedente.
SUSPENSION DE TRAMITES
Art. 193. - El curso de todos los procesos se suspenderá, si tramitasen ante un mismo juez, desde que se promoviere la cuestión. Si tramitasen ante jueces distintos, desde que se comunicare el pedido de acumulación al juez respectivo. Exceptúanse las medidas o diligencias de cuya omisión pudiere resultar perjuicio.
SENTENCIA UNICA
Art. 194. - Los procesos acumulados se sustanciarán y fallarán conjuntamente, pero si el trámite resultare dificultoso por la naturaleza de las cuestiones planteadas, podrá el juez disponer, sin recurso, que cada proceso se sustancie por separado, dictando una sola sentencia.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +1 | Doctrine of the Court First Seised (of the matter) |
Adrian MM.
|
| 3 | prevention principle |
Juan Arturo Blackmore Zerón
|
| 3 | precautionary principle |
Lisa Rosengard
|
Change log
Jun 2, 2020 15:14: Adrian MM. Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+1
4 hrs
Adrian MM.
Austria
Austria
Native in English
Specializes in field
Austria
Retd.T&I, Barrister & Austro-Advokat
Native in: English (Variants: British, Scottish) 
Works in: Spanish to English, English to Spanish, French to English, and 5 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
586
Selected
Doctrine of the Court First Seised (of the matter)
Court first seised of the matter, meaning dealing with the case in an 'accumulation' = joinder of multiple actions, rather than seized in the sense of overrun by prtotesters (sounds daft, but there is a DEU/ENG answer on ProZ referring to seis/zed (owner) of land in fee simple and claims the property has been confiscated).
Funnily enough and dovetailing with the other question, ties up with the doctrine of lis alibi pendens (defenc/se or plea that the case is pending in litigation elsewhere).
Prevención 'being the first court to hear a case (Butterworths). thus *pre-empting the jurisdiction of other courts' (West).
Funnily enough and dovetailing with the other question, ties up with the doctrine of lis alibi pendens (defenc/se or plea that the case is pending in litigation elsewhere).
Prevención 'being the first court to hear a case (Butterworths). thus *pre-empting the jurisdiction of other courts' (West).
Example sentence:
The Article provides for the court first seised to have priority in the same cause of action between the same parties.
Establishment of jurisdiction of the court first seised by reason of appearance being entered without objection by the parties or the adoption of a final judgment.
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Lester Tattersall
: Defo. Or Criterion/Basis/Rule of Prior Jurisdiction of the Court First Seised. Prevenir: 8. DER Realizar un juzgado las diligencias preparatorias de un juicio (Maria Moliner)
13 hrs
|
|
Thanks, Lester. I like the idea of the '(court) first-seised rule'. About the only permutation that might not work is a 'maxim' e.g. a Maxim of Equity_ 's/he who comes to Equity must come with (topically) clean hands'.
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
43 mins
Juan Arturo Blackmore Zerón
Mexico
Mexico
Native in Spanish
Works in field
Mexico
Confianza, certeza, creatividad.
Native in: Spanish (Variant: Mexican)
Works in: English to Spanish, Italian to Spanish, French to Spanish, and 6 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
57
1 day 6 hrs
Lisa Rosengard
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Native in English
United Kingdom
experienced and well qualified linguist
Native in: English (Variant: UK)
Works in: Spanish to English, English, Spanish, and 3 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
36
precautionary principle
I found a few definitions of 'prevención': 'precaution, prevention, preparation, prejudice, police station'.
(Collins dictionary Spanish-English)
(Collins dictionary Spanish-English)
Example sentence:
Que el estado de las causas permita su sustanción conjunta, sin producir demora perjudicial e injustificada en el trámite de los que estuvieren más avanzados. "Principio de Prevención" La acumulación se hará sobre el expediente ...
Let the state of the causes permit its combined sustainability, without producing detrimental or unjustified delays in the most advanced proceedings. - Precautionary Principle.- The accumulation will be made in the means ....
Reference comments
1 hr
11 hrs
Taña Dalglish
Jamaica
Jamaica
Native in English
Specializes in field
Jamaica
Translating the Ideas Behind the Words
Native in: English (Variant: British)
Works in: Spanish to English, English to Spanish, French to English, and 2 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
735
Reference:
Refs. - Doctrine of forum non conveniens?
Could it be the "Doctrine of Forum Non-conveniens"?
https://www.arbitration-icca.org/media/4/32472823740148/medi...
Parallel and competing proceedings between international courts and tribunals,
just as between international and domestic tribunals, is not a new phenomenon but
certainly one that is gaining in recurrence. This is turn is the inevitable consequence of
the proliferation of international courts and tribunals, on the one hand, and the lack of
appropriate legal rules to deal with the matter, on the other hand. While there is little
that can be done at present about the proliferation issue, there is much than can be done
in respect of the governing legal principles and rules.
The common law doctrine of forum non–conveniens has proven to be an
effective supplementary approach to this question. As a recent resolution of the Institut
de Droit International on the principles governing this doctrine has stated, “Parallel
litigation in more than one country between the same, or related, parties in relation to
the same, or related, issues may lead to injustice, delay, increased expense, and
inconsistent decisions”. As it is a shared understanding that these negative
consequences must be avoided, forum non–conveniens has been gaining international
acceptability, although many times the same objectives have been achieved under
doctrines of abus de droit, closer to civil law jurisdictions, and lis pendens when applied
as a general principle of law.
Forum Non Conveniens - Jstorwww.jstor.org › stable
... Rican Code of Civil Procedure, embodying the so-called "principle of prevention" in jurisdictional ... even to grasp) the doctrine of forum non conveniens, seve.
by AM Garro - 2003 - Cited by 18 - Related articles
Forum Non Conveniens - University of Miami School of Law ...repository.law.miami.edu › cgi › viewcontentPDF
Jan 1, 2004 - of Civil Procedure, embodying the so-called "principle of prevention" in ... even to grasp) the doctrine of forum non conveniens, several.
http://opiniojuris.org/2009/01/02/forum-non-conveniens-block...
Forum Non Conveniens Blocking Statutes - Opinio Jurisopiniojuris.org › 2009/01/02 › forum-non-conveniens-...
Jan 2, 2009 - Panama has a “forum non conveniens blocking statute” that precludes ... Analogous to the principle of “prevention of performance” in our law of ...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 hrs (2020-06-01 10:33:40 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40176577?seq=1
https://www.jstor.org/topic/forum-non-conveniens/?refreqid=e...
Topic: Forum Non Conveniens
Forum non conveniens (Latin for "forum not agreeing") (FNC) is a (mostly) common law legal doctrine whereby courts may refuse to take jurisdiction over matters where there is a more appropriate forum available to the parties. As a doctrine of the conflict of laws, forum non conveniens applies between courts in different countries and between courts in different jurisdictions in the same country. Forum non conveniens is not applicable between counties or federal districts within a state. A concern often raised in applications of the doctrine is forum shopping, or picking a court merely to gain an advantage in the proceeding. This concern is balanced against the public policy of deferring to a plaintiff's choice of venue in claims where there may be more than one appropriate jurisdiction. The underlying principles, such as basing respect given to foreign courts on reciprocal respect or comity, also apply in civil law systems in the form of the legal doctrine of lis alibi pendens.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 hrs (2020-06-01 10:42:21 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Forum Non Conveniens - University of Miami School of Law ...repository.law.miami.edu › cgi › viewcontentPDF
Jan 1, 2004 - Motions to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens ... of Civil Procedure, embodying the so-called "principle of prevention" in ...
by AM Garro - 2004 - Cited by 18 - Related articles
(PDF) Forum Shopping Before International Tribunals: (Real ...www.researchgate.net › publication › 228121997_Forum...
Part IV discusses why “general principles” such as res judicata, lis pendens, and forum non conveniens do not appropriately address the problem of forum ...
SCOTTS COMPANY v. HACIENDA LOMA LINDA | FindLawcaselaw.findlaw.com › fl-district-court-of-appeal
Scotts moved to dismiss the complaint for forum non conveniens, but the motion was ... Analogous to the principle of “prevention of performance” in our law of ...
GEG WP 138 Legal Developments in the ... - EconStorwww.econstor.eu › bitstream › GEG-WP-138
PDF
alleged the defence of forum non conveniens and asked the court to reject the case ... the principle of prevention: “If the conflict of law rule pointed only in one ...
by MA Gwynn - 2018 - Cited by 2 - Related articles
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 23 hrs (2020-06-02 13:37:39 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
@ 678:
https://books.google.com.jm/books?id=lXIQQDyOYtkC&pg=PA32&lp...
Declining Jurisdiction in Private International Law: Reports to the XIVth ...
By J. J. Fawcett
Note:
***Page 32: I am not disputing the answer put forward, i.e. the "Court of first-seised principle/doctrine". *** However, page 32 says, "Moving outstide Western Europe, Argentinian law has a doctrine of litispendencia. Litispendencia by identity requires the parties, object, and cause be the same for both sets of proceedings. In this situation, the Argentinian judge will decline jurisdiction is respect of the second proceedings.
[---] When is a Court Seised of Proceeedings?
See page 75 for Argentina: In Argentina there is no non-dscretionary rule that requires the courts to decline jurisdiction in cases involving a foreing choice of jurisdiction clause, except, as observed earlier, when some question relating to Argentine public order is involved.
Page 46: Argentinian law has a doctrine of litispendencia by connexity. This applies wehre one of the three elements (same parties, object, cause) for lis pendens (litispendencia by identy is missing). Under this rule, the Argentinian court will order the "accumulation of the proceedings".
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 23 hrs (2020-06-02 13:38:39 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
Oops: Page 75 ... foreign choice ...
https://www.arbitration-icca.org/media/4/32472823740148/medi...
Parallel and competing proceedings between international courts and tribunals,
just as between international and domestic tribunals, is not a new phenomenon but
certainly one that is gaining in recurrence. This is turn is the inevitable consequence of
the proliferation of international courts and tribunals, on the one hand, and the lack of
appropriate legal rules to deal with the matter, on the other hand. While there is little
that can be done at present about the proliferation issue, there is much than can be done
in respect of the governing legal principles and rules.
The common law doctrine of forum non–conveniens has proven to be an
effective supplementary approach to this question. As a recent resolution of the Institut
de Droit International on the principles governing this doctrine has stated, “Parallel
litigation in more than one country between the same, or related, parties in relation to
the same, or related, issues may lead to injustice, delay, increased expense, and
inconsistent decisions”. As it is a shared understanding that these negative
consequences must be avoided, forum non–conveniens has been gaining international
acceptability, although many times the same objectives have been achieved under
doctrines of abus de droit, closer to civil law jurisdictions, and lis pendens when applied
as a general principle of law.
Forum Non Conveniens - Jstorwww.jstor.org › stable
... Rican Code of Civil Procedure, embodying the so-called "principle of prevention" in jurisdictional ... even to grasp) the doctrine of forum non conveniens, seve.
by AM Garro - 2003 - Cited by 18 - Related articles
Forum Non Conveniens - University of Miami School of Law ...repository.law.miami.edu › cgi › viewcontentPDF
Jan 1, 2004 - of Civil Procedure, embodying the so-called "principle of prevention" in ... even to grasp) the doctrine of forum non conveniens, several.
http://opiniojuris.org/2009/01/02/forum-non-conveniens-block...
Forum Non Conveniens Blocking Statutes - Opinio Jurisopiniojuris.org › 2009/01/02 › forum-non-conveniens-...
Jan 2, 2009 - Panama has a “forum non conveniens blocking statute” that precludes ... Analogous to the principle of “prevention of performance” in our law of ...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 hrs (2020-06-01 10:33:40 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://www.jstor.org/stable/40176577?seq=1
https://www.jstor.org/topic/forum-non-conveniens/?refreqid=e...
Topic: Forum Non Conveniens
Forum non conveniens (Latin for "forum not agreeing") (FNC) is a (mostly) common law legal doctrine whereby courts may refuse to take jurisdiction over matters where there is a more appropriate forum available to the parties. As a doctrine of the conflict of laws, forum non conveniens applies between courts in different countries and between courts in different jurisdictions in the same country. Forum non conveniens is not applicable between counties or federal districts within a state. A concern often raised in applications of the doctrine is forum shopping, or picking a court merely to gain an advantage in the proceeding. This concern is balanced against the public policy of deferring to a plaintiff's choice of venue in claims where there may be more than one appropriate jurisdiction. The underlying principles, such as basing respect given to foreign courts on reciprocal respect or comity, also apply in civil law systems in the form of the legal doctrine of lis alibi pendens.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 hrs (2020-06-01 10:42:21 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Forum Non Conveniens - University of Miami School of Law ...repository.law.miami.edu › cgi › viewcontentPDF
Jan 1, 2004 - Motions to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens ... of Civil Procedure, embodying the so-called "principle of prevention" in ...
by AM Garro - 2004 - Cited by 18 - Related articles
(PDF) Forum Shopping Before International Tribunals: (Real ...www.researchgate.net › publication › 228121997_Forum...
Part IV discusses why “general principles” such as res judicata, lis pendens, and forum non conveniens do not appropriately address the problem of forum ...
SCOTTS COMPANY v. HACIENDA LOMA LINDA | FindLawcaselaw.findlaw.com › fl-district-court-of-appeal
Scotts moved to dismiss the complaint for forum non conveniens, but the motion was ... Analogous to the principle of “prevention of performance” in our law of ...
GEG WP 138 Legal Developments in the ... - EconStorwww.econstor.eu › bitstream › GEG-WP-138
alleged the defence of forum non conveniens and asked the court to reject the case ... the principle of prevention: “If the conflict of law rule pointed only in one ...
by MA Gwynn - 2018 - Cited by 2 - Related articles
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 23 hrs (2020-06-02 13:37:39 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
@ 678:
https://books.google.com.jm/books?id=lXIQQDyOYtkC&pg=PA32&lp...
Declining Jurisdiction in Private International Law: Reports to the XIVth ...
By J. J. Fawcett
Note:
***Page 32: I am not disputing the answer put forward, i.e. the "Court of first-seised principle/doctrine". *** However, page 32 says, "Moving outstide Western Europe, Argentinian law has a doctrine of litispendencia. Litispendencia by identity requires the parties, object, and cause be the same for both sets of proceedings. In this situation, the Argentinian judge will decline jurisdiction is respect of the second proceedings.
[---] When is a Court Seised of Proceeedings?
See page 75 for Argentina: In Argentina there is no non-dscretionary rule that requires the courts to decline jurisdiction in cases involving a foreing choice of jurisdiction clause, except, as observed earlier, when some question relating to Argentine public order is involved.
Page 46: Argentinian law has a doctrine of litispendencia by connexity. This applies wehre one of the three elements (same parties, object, cause) for lis pendens (litispendencia by identy is missing). Under this rule, the Argentinian court will order the "accumulation of the proceedings".
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day 23 hrs (2020-06-02 13:38:39 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
Oops: Page 75 ... foreign choice ...
Note from asker:
| Thanks Taña! The information you provide is always very useful!. |
Discussion
EL PRINCIPIO DE PREVENCIÓN. LA CAUSA ROZNIATOWSKY VS ESTADO NACIONAL THE PRINCIPLE OF PREVENTION. THE CAUSE ROZNIATOWSKY VS NATIONAL STATE CRISTINA DEL CAMPO