English term
tiered supplier
3 | fornecedor secundário | Leonor Machado |
4 | fornecedor sistemista ou de módulo | Ana Mendes da Silva |
4 | fornecedor hierarquicamente designado | Teresa Freixinho |
3 | fornecedor qualificado | ferreirac |
Dec 8, 2017 21:57: Yvonne Gallagher changed "Language pair" from "English" to "English to Portuguese"
Non-PRO (1): Patricia Franco
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
fornecedor secundário
Direito administrativo
EN
lower tier supplier
PT
fornecedor secundário
fornecedor qualificado
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2017-12-08 22:00:50 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Ou, eventualmente, pré-qualificado.
fornecedor sistemista ou de módulo
Se pesquisar no google por tier supplier aparecem os diferentes níveis e explicação. O termo sub-fornecedor também se pode adequar.
Bom trabalho!
Discussion