GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
11:01 Dec 27, 2010 |
Spanish to English translations [PRO] International Org/Dev/Coop / infringements of human rights in Colombia | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Selected response from: Charles Davis Spain Local time: 04:06 | ||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +3 | What was not affected was the legalization (laundering) of their assets |
| ||
4 | However, the legalization of their assets was left untouched. |
|
Discussion entries: 4 | |
---|---|
What was not affected was the legalization (laundering) of their assets Explanation: I think "legalización económica de bienes" must refer to money laundering, obviously a huge issue in relation to the Colombian paramilitaries who are deeply into the drugs business. I take it to mean that the provisions of the Justice and Peace process do not affect that aspect. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 50 mins (2010-12-27 11:51:40 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Thanks, Deborah. I would have posted some links, but I'm a bit busy this morning! -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2010-12-27 13:52:59 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Maybe something like "What was left untouched was..." or "Nothing was done to interfere with..." might go some way to meeting Yaiza's point about the tone. I think "They were left in peace to get on with..." would be over-interpreting. |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||