Dec 3, 2006 19:05
17 yrs ago
13 viewers *
English term

reproduce vs. duplicate vs. copy

English Law/Patents Internet, e-Commerce
this is a paragraph from a Terms of Service section of a website:

NO RESALE OF SERVICE
You agree not to reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, resell, or exploit any portion of the Service, use of the Service, or access to the Service.

my question is: what's the difference between reproducing, copying and duplicating information when we're talking about blogs, i.e. the "information" may be text, music, sound files, photos, graphics within the user blogs, and the code of the "service" itself is open-source and therefore CAN be reproduced.

thanks!

Discussion

zmejka (asker) Dec 3, 2006:
never mind that, i realized it's a different question right now i just want to understand the difference between "reproduce", "duplicate" and "copy" when we're talking about most any kind of data imagineable on the web
Vladimir Dubisskiy Dec 3, 2006:
it CAN be reproduced indeed, but you (as a user) agrees NOT to do all those things you can... to me it does not really matter what is the difference between the possible ways of using (misusing) the info or service.

Responses

+3
1 hr
Selected

differences

First of all, "reproduce" is an animal different from the other two. When we talk about reproducing a scientific result or a software error, we mean going throw steps of producing it all over again (in these examples - by repeating the same steps).

Duplicate and copy are listed as synonyms practically everywhere and are often used unterchangeably. However, "duplicate" may mean "creating the same by different means". For example, a movie may strive to duplicate success of another, i.e. get comparable box office results and critical acclaim.

Copy is just that. Think of copying your classmate's homework - letter for letter.

Although "copy" an "duplicate" are synonyms, lawers find it necessary to list both in legal warnings. This completely eliminates a possiblility of somebody later citing narrow meanings of words claiming something like "yes, we duplicated but no, we didn't copy"
Peer comment(s):

agree kmtext
1 hr
Thank you, kmtext.
agree Lubosh Hanuska
1 day 15 hrs
Thanks, Guru.
agree Tereza McLaughlin-Vanova
5 days
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "спасибище! "
8 hrs

repeat the production steps vs. high volume high quality copy vs. low volume standard quality copy

Reproduce can be easily define as "repeat produce", i.e. repeat the production steps.

Duplicating/copying is simply making copies of the original. The idea to distinguish them comes from paper copying regarding volume and quality. They are carried out into digital realm because law and lawyers tend to be inert to change. Law and their people are used to be the last to change in everything. ;)

Ref:
http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/rep_pub/reports/197...
Copying (much of which is often referred to as 'convenience copying') is characterised by user requirements of relatively short run lengths and low copy volume. ..The main reprographic processes that cater for this particular purpose are thermal, dual spectrum, diffusion transfer, diazo and both direct ('coated paper') and indirect ('plain paper') electrostatic copying. Electrostatic copying represents the major recent innovation in convenience copying. ...

Duplicating is characterised by long run lengths and large copy volumes. High copy quality and colour copying capability are often also required. The major processes used for this particular purpose are spirit, stencil, offset lithography and latterly some of the faster plain paper copiers. ...
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search