GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
17:18 Oct 8, 2004 |
German to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: swisstell Italy Local time: 13:28 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 +1 | directory provision / mandatory provision |
| ||
4 | should stipulation / must-stipulation |
| ||
1 +3 | estimated provision, compulsory provision |
| ||
3 | general guideline vs specific directive |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
should stipulation / must-stipulation Explanation: Therefore, such stipulation is a should-stipulation rather than a must-stipulation. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 46 mins (2004-10-08 18:04:05 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Chapter 11 - [ Diese Seite übersetzen ] ... that while the \"shall\" stipulation indicates a mandatory situation, there are many instances where the courts have ruled that a \"should\" stipulation in some ... www.azace.org/Highway Users Manual/Chapter 11.htm - 57k - -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 46 mins (2004-10-08 18:04:53 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- based on the given reference, you might wish to say: \"should\" stipulation rather than a mandatory stipulation. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |