GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
22:48 Jan 28, 2009 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Social Sciences - Social Science, Sociology, Ethics, etc. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Anton Baer United Kingdom Local time: 13:48 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +8 | See explanation |
| ||
5 | not necessarily incorrect. |
| ||
4 | replace because there can be no substitute in this case |
| ||
3 | displaced |
|
Discussion entries: 9 | |
---|---|
See explanation Explanation: It depends. Does barbasco "substitute for" dioscorea in a process of some kind? "To substitute for" means the replacement is temporary. To replace is permanent. "If you don't have cinnamon, use nutmeg." That's a substitute. If you think the recipe turns out better with nutmeg, replace the cinnamon with nutmeg. Let the nutmeg take cinnamon's place, take over its role -- and not merely "substitute for", stand in for it until the cinnamon is back from holiday. So much depends on what follows your ellipsis. |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||