https://www.proz.com/kudoz/danish-to-english/law-general/2023571-misligholdelse.html?phpv_redirected=1&phpv_redirected=2
This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site, while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
Cookie settings
kandidatmodul
turistbus
Jul 12, 2007 13:24
16 yrs ago
10 viewers *
Danish term

misligholdelse

Danish to English Law/Patents Law (general)
One of the points in a terms and conditions contract.
Not breach of contract, but rather when the customer doesn't adequately take care of the goods and they develop cracks or other defects.
Proposed translations (English)
3 +3 Non-compliance
4 nonperformance
4 default
3 -1 post-contractual repudiation

Discussion

swedrom (X) Mar 12, 2011:
Mislighodelse ifolge sysnrappoort= negligence following visual inspection?

Proposed translations

+3
3 mins
Selected

Non-compliance

Here is a suggestion
Peer comment(s):
agree tinea31 : I agree
1 hr
thanks
agree Helle Sabroe
15 hrs
thanks
agree Helen Johnson
17 hrs
thanks
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Good one, thanks!"
8 mins

nonperformance

my suggestion

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 mins (2007-07-12 13:34:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

http://www.answers.com/topic/nonperformance?cat=biz-fin

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 mins (2007-07-12 13:35:23 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

http://onlinedictionary.datasegment.com/word/nonperformance
Something went wrong...
-1
3 hrs

post-contractual repudiation

Unless this is a trial period offer, the supolier would either have to 'accept' the customer's repudiatory 'breach' and carry on with the contract or reject and terminate.
Example sentence:

... allow the insurers to terminate the contract (by accepting repudiation). ... If the right to avoid in a post-contract context is exercisable only when ...

Reference:

http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?article_id=14186&site=fol

Peer comment(s):
neutral Charlesp : yes, but aren't you being a bit too strong here. As a lawyer complaining (on behalf of client, of course), and asserting a default, this might be ok. But doesn't it lack nutrality?
2 hrs
Right. But we still don't know if this is post- or pre-contract i.e. an anticipatory breach or gen. default.
disagree Andrew Bramhall : Not approved by the Committee for the Campaign for Plain English Use Amongst Austronauts.
5530 days
Something went wrong...
5 hrs

default

there are a bunch of possibilities, however in my view, "default" would be simplist, and most encompassing.
Something went wrong...