Samlingsförsäkring

17:46 Dec 5, 2013 

To little context often generates very heated discussione where many talk at cross-purposes, often unnecessarily heatedly.
Let wisdom rule and aim for a KudoZ truce. Lowers blood pressure and promotes good cooperation.

16:14 Dec 5, 2013 

LOL! In the 'dark' forests of Tiveden half way between the east and west coasts...

15:59 Dec 5, 2013 

It's time you two got out the duelling pistols and settled it once and for all!!

14:54 Dec 5, 2013 

Thanks for the extra info. Your question is looking more & more elaborate. Pls. try and confirm that the RAS applies to a group, fleet or pool of rally vehicles or just one, driven no doubt by a Scandinavian supremo. I can't work it out from 'delmängd av funktionella och kompletterande krav...'

14:53 Dec 5, 2013 

Rally Samlingsförsäkring - looks like a rally where participants sign up.

14:23 Dec 5, 2013 

that the Poster has to provide more context.
Without the context, and there surely is more here in the document, which the Askder could provide, it gives rise to this type of discussion and disagreement. There are times when such a discussion is appropriate and useful, but I don't think that is one of those cases here.
So Asker: how about posting some more details from your document!

14:01 Dec 5, 2013 

Your statement is again in violation of the rule I cited below. Who's answer is 'faulty' here, and why? My reference is one of many available online for everyone interested to review and analyse as they wish.

13:53 Dec 5, 2013 

When an individual wants to insure more than one actively utilised auto, that person simply includes the second auto under their regular vehicle insurance policy. There is no separate term that refers to this situation, in Sweden or the UK/US. The same applies to a private collection of vehicles or otherwise, unless a special arrangement is made. As the industry reference I cited below indicates -- this UK firm offers 'Fleet' insurance for 'Mini Fleet' up to 10 vehicles. So you statement that the term here 'may equally well concern ...' is incorrect.

13:27 Dec 5, 2013 

"Samlingsförsäkring" may indeed concern "a company vehicle pool or fleet" but it may equally well concern a private person's vehicles e.g. a collection of veteran cars that rarely are driven + one or two frequently used cars.

13:26 Dec 5, 2013 

My reference below is a UK/Intn'l firm based in UK, so the AE - BE distinction isn't all that definite, tho they don't seem to operate in India!

13:14 Dec 5, 2013 

Maybe the asker can provide more context as 'motor' in the singular didn't or doesn't look to me like e.g a company pool or fleet of vehicles.

12:26 Dec 5, 2013 

"Samlingsförsäkring" innebär att flera fordon samlats i en försäkringspolis, se t.ex http://www.traktorforening.com/Forsakring_trafik_Orebro.pdf. It is totally unrelated to whether the insurance is comprehensive or not.

09:22 Dec 5, 2013 

A linguistic explanation as to what Sven's link is meant to prove is IMHO lacking.

07:33 Dec 5, 2013 

This kind of remark has no linguistic value or relation to the question asked or answer given. See "A peer comment must be based on linguistic evaluations of the answer." at (http://www.proz.com/siterules/kudoz_answ/3.5#3.5)