10:18 Oct 17, 2019 |
German to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Patents, Trademarks, Copyright / An appeal against Federal Patent court | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Selected response from: Michael Martin, MA United States Local time: 13:33 | |||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | It sounds like it |
| ||
3 | procedural flaw triggering an appeal |
|
It sounds like it Explanation: It sounds like it. I am not a lawyer but that is what I understood from the following www.vwv.co.uk/news-and-events/blog/appeal-capable-of-rectif... “…the importance of an appeal procedure as an opportunity to remedy procedural defects.” www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/caselaw/2019/e/cl... and at V. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARDS OF APPEAL 9.5.1 Violation must be of a procedural nature www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/caselaw/2019/e/cl... May be I am handpicking, ergo it needs more legal and scholar scrutiny. Reference: http://www.vwv.co.uk/news-and-events/blog/appeal-capable-of-... Reference: http://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/caselaw/201... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
procedural flaw triggering an appeal Explanation: You really have two terms here. In the English translation, "eröffnender" goes with Rechtsbeschwerde, not Verfahrensmangel. It may be best to split up that sentence: Its admissibility follows from the fact that a procedural flaw has been met with a rebuke. The flaw, which is listed in the law, gives rise to/triggers a permissible appeal. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.