GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
03:27 Dec 21, 2019 |
French to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Electronics / Elect Eng | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 02:48 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +5 | 0.8 [mm²] |
|
Discussion entries: 10 | |
---|---|
0.8 [mm²] Explanation: It is definitely 0.8, but what of depends entirely on the context — very often, it is thickness in mm (often used for things like sheet-metal), but here, as it is talking about cross-sectional area, we can assume it is referring to the size of a conductor of some kind (I'm assuming your context will confirm this!), in which case it should be mm². Do note that it is not possible to actually measure cross-sectional area directly, which is why in certain fields we will use a "wire gauge" — e.g. swg or awg — which is a diameter-based measuring system from which the cross-sectional area can be inferred. 0.8 mm² is a fairly light-duty conductor, the sort of thing that might be used for signals wiring or very low power applications; for comparison, common sizes for power cables in domestic use might be 1 mm² / 1.5 mm² / 2.5 mm². -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 day 16 hrs (2019-12-22 20:01:22 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Note that for sizes over 1 mm², it is normal to write it in the more conventional fashion, e.g. 2.5 mm² However, for sub-millimetre sizes, this older-fashioned way of expressing it is not that unusual, even today. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||