GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
06:31 Jun 4, 2016 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Nuclear Eng/Sci | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 04:11 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +7 | See explanation |
|
See explanation Explanation: 'control power' is the power that is used to control the valves: the implication is that the AC power is used to actually drive the valves (presumably motorized ones), but the valves are 'controlled' (told when to open or close) using a DC control signal. So the AC supply must have been OK, otherwise the valves wouldn't have moved at all; but failure ('loss') of the power supply going to the protection system would result in loss of the DC control signal, which would cause the valves to close automatically by default. Sounds like a 'fail-safe' system that wasn't! |
| |