GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
02:00 Nov 18, 2006 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Bus/Financial - Management / mergers | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: ErichEko ⟹⭐ Indonesia Local time: 18:30 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | match your culture integration approach with your merger purpose |
|
integration extent versus deal rationale match your culture integration approach with your merger purpose Explanation: IMO, "versus" here should be read "matching", i.e. choice of integration extent must be matched well with the deal rationale. We have three deal rationales: = active investing --> acquire new business (i.e. buy a business different than the one you've already had, e.g. a telco buys a retail) = growing scope --> acquire vertical business (e.g. an oil sxproducer buy a petrol station chain) = growing economies of scale --> acquire same business and rationalize later in search of efficiency and three integration extent: minimal, selective, and comprehensive. Sample of matching: comprehensive integration seems to be a must for the third deal (growing economies of scale). That's in my IMHO. Re. on title simplification, I propose this: Match Culture Integration Approach with Merger Objectives -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 5 hrs (2006-11-18 07:14:16 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Pls read end of sample: .... That's in my humble opinion (IMHO) |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.