GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
21:31 May 4, 2010 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Bus/Financial - International Org/Dev/Coop / Budget | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 02:17 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | method of attributing the impact made to a program and its funding |
| ||
3 | what it's going to be used for |
| ||
3 | allocation |
| ||
3 | naming the source of funds |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
attribution what it's going to be used for Explanation: 'attribution' usually means roughly the same as 'allocation', but they seem to be making a deliberate distinction here, so my understanding would be that 'attribution' will expect the answer "what it is it going to be used for" (whereas 'allocation' would expect the answer "who it is going to be given to" — which department, etc.) However, there is a degree of ambiguity and confusion between these terms, so if you need to pin down the difference more precisely for the purposes of your onward translation, you might need to ask your client just how their particular organization defines the difference between the 2 terms. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
attribution method of attributing the impact made to a program and its funding Explanation: I think the writer is using attribution as an insider word used to describe the process of attributing credit for the impact made in development funding and programming. If you look on page 19 of the working paper http://www.cgdev.org/doc/events/12.14.06/Global Fund Transcr... (about the Global Fund) you will see the director's comment about the difficulty of attributing impact. He says "For example, if a recipient came back to us and said, using PEPFAR money and Global Fund money, these are our impact results, and 60 percent of the money was from PEPFAR and 40% of the money is from the Global Fund, so we're going to invent the reality that 40% of the impact was Global Fund's and 60% of the impact was PEPFAR's, just prorata on the input of money, we'd say fine, it makes common sense... We certainly don't want expensive inquiries to attribute impact to Global Fund finance rather than someone else's finance." There is currently a lot of talk about improving analysis in order to redirect funding from programs that have little or no impact to programs that have greater impact. Attribution is an attempt to see what funding is giving results. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
attribution allocation Explanation: I have a feeling that as in many of these international organizations, you may be dealing with what is already a translation, and maybe the translator for some reason thought both words were equally good and used them in this way. To me it's synonymous with allocation in this context. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
attribution naming the source of funds Explanation: I think is this context the agency supplying the funds may be asking the receipient, (since donor funds may be comingeled in a common fund from may sources), to either provide attribution (to us the funders), or a specific allocation (how the funds will be used) or anticipated (how the funds will be most probably used, if not yet allocated) - in the detailed budget information. Attribution to the donor may be an acceptable way of detailing for the budget in lieu of allocation or anticipated use. If there is a specific allocation or anticipated use, then that attribution would not be necessary. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.