proprietary research

English translation: research not publicly available

08:29 Feb 13, 2017
English language (monolingual) [PRO]
General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters
English term or phrase: proprietary research
Hello everyone,

http://perpetualradarcommunications.com/hug-your-haters-part...

“Eliminating fear, especially of public responses to public complaints, and then answering those complaints is an opportunity. In fact, it’s quite possibly the single greatest opportunity you have to keep your customers and grow your business. And I can say that not as my own opinion but as a fact, based on ***proprietary research*** that determined the precise impact of the methods you’ll discover in Hug Your Haters."

I've found the following definition of "proprietary research":
http://research.stonybrook.edu/export-controls/other-exempti...

PROPRIETARY RESEARCH means research and industrial development, design, production, and product utilization, the results of which ordinarily are restricted for proprietary or national security reasons (as distinguished from fundamental research- basic and applied research in science and engineering, the results of which ordinarily are published and shared broadly within the scientific community).

I'm not not sure I understand correctly what "proprietary research" means (especially in my context above).
Does it mean that the author of the book (Jay Baer) conducted research and this research (its availability) is restricted. And what's the difference between, say, "he conducted research" and "he conducted proprietary research"?

Thank you.
Mikhail Korolev
Local time: 12:09
Selected answer:research not publicly available
Explanation:
The author is saying that the research was done by a company (or private individual), not a public university or other public institution. Note that the author is NOT saying that they themselves did the research.

What they are *really* saying is "there is proof of my statements but you can't see it, you will just have to trust me"!

Selected response from:

Terry Richards
France
Local time: 11:09
Grading comment
Many thanks to everyone.
Thank you, Terry.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED
4 +6research not publicly available
Terry Richards
2 +1our/their own research
Daryo


Discussion entries: 6





  

Answers


10 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +6
research not publicly available


Explanation:
The author is saying that the research was done by a company (or private individual), not a public university or other public institution. Note that the author is NOT saying that they themselves did the research.

What they are *really* saying is "there is proof of my statements but you can't see it, you will just have to trust me"!



Terry Richards
France
Local time: 11:09
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 120
Grading comment
Many thanks to everyone.
Thank you, Terry.

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  BrigitteHilgner
51 mins

agree  magdadh: Yes, and in this context I def think it's very much Mickey Mouse research.
5 hrs

neutral  Daryo: there is no rule that whatever is "proprietary" must be kept secret - a patent that is "proprietary" to some company is definitely one of the most publicly available information you could think of!
5 hrs

agree  acetran
8 hrs

neutral  AllegroTrans: I cannot see how it is necessarily private/confidential research. Proprietary research CAN be made public as far as I am aware
8 hrs

agree  B D Finch: Agree with your "What they are *really* saying ... ". Their reference to this as "proprietary research", without naming the researcher, smells bad.
10 hrs

agree  Yvonne Gallagher: proprietary=research owned and reserved exclusively for the client who purchased the research (for their own uses and not necessarily for dissemination elsewhere).
1 day 13 hrs

agree  Ashutosh Mitra
2 days 5 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

6 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 2/5Answerer confidence 2/5 peer agreement (net): +1
our/their own research


Explanation:
this seems the most likely intended meaning, but only CL2

sounds like "they've done the research after themselves decided that it's a subject worth researching" // ("using some research methods specific only to them" is rather unlikely as meaning as that wouldn't really be a good selling point!)


As Tom Webster explained in his fine foreword to this book, I partnered with his firm—the highly respected attitude collection group Edison Research—to take a close look at the current state of hate.
http://perpetualradarcommunications.com/hug-your-haters-part...

so this research was conducted by the "highly respected attitude collection group Edison Research" - on their own initiative? for their own internal needs?



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 14 hrs (2017-02-13 23:24:47 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

after additional clarification from references found by Alison MacG:

our/their (Edison's) own research conducted for clients

note: I really can't see why on Earth you should presume that this kind of "proprietary research" of public opinion / attitudes is to be equated with "Mickey Mouse science" / trumpery / smells bad and similar - if there is one field where "pleasing the client" by "finding (desired) results to order" is totally pointless it's market research!!! What sane business would be paying to get "desirable results" instead of learning what is the real situation in the relevant market???



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 hrs (2017-02-14 00:23:27 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

all this "proprietary research" was paid for by Edison Research's clients - political parties or partisan press may want to hear something that pleases their ears, but most clients would want to know what are the real attitudes / opinions of their existing or potential customers - they would have absolutely no motivation to ask for any kind of "dodgy research"!

The Tony Blair school of fact finding won't last long in a market research environment ...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day11 hrs (2017-02-14 19:55:56 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

not even 45 minutes!

Daryo
United Kingdom
Local time: 10:09
Works in field
Native speaker of: Native in SerbianSerbian, Native in FrenchFrench
PRO pts in category: 8

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  AllegroTrans: effectively research using their own their own resources and methods - results usually restricted to internal use/specific persons/entities but not necessarily
2 hrs
  -> Thanks!

neutral  B D Finch: No, Edison Research say that they do "proprietary research", which seems to mean research done for a specific customer without making methods and results available for peer review. So, possibly trumpery.
4 hrs
  -> "without making methods and results available for peer review" would probably apply to 99% of opinion pools + if they managed to get reliable results with only small samples of respondents, they are for sure going to keep their techniques secret!
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search