GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
10:57 Jun 23, 2016 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Agriculture | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 18:43 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +6 | synonyms |
|
synonyms Explanation: No, there is no material difference in meaning; they are simply using 'products ex wheat' because it flows better when following 'for', whereas the other usage works better when there is no preposition. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 28 minutes (2016-06-23 11:25:43 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Yes, that's right, Asker! -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 29 minutes (2016-06-23 11:27:08 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- If you think about it, the reverse wouldn't make any real sense: if we are talking about the contents of certain types of products, it's not very useful to then switch to talking about 'all other products except...' -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 5 heures (2016-06-23 16:32:09 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Asker, do not that in this sort of sense, 'ex' is not an abbreviation of anything (as it would be, for example, in 'ex. VAT' = 'excluding VAT') but is simply the Latin word 'ex' meaning 'from' — as used in terms like 'ex works' or 'ex libris'. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 6 heures (2016-06-23 17:27:07 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- ** note ** |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||