art document
Swedish translation: teknikens ståndpunkt
| GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 13:02 Jun 12, 2004 |
| English to Swedish translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Taxation & Customs / patents�kning | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: EKM Sweden Local time: 13:25 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | handling rörande teknikens ståndpunkt |
| ||
| 2 | konsthandling |
|
Answers
51 mins confidence: 
konsthandling Explanation: document can be translated into "handling" or "intyg", but I think the most appropriate is handling, since intyg has a meaning of "certificate", of something that has already been registered. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
| The asker has declined this answer Comment: Eftersom det handlar om patentansökan så tror jag inte art översätts med konst i det här fallet. Men tack ändå. | ||
4 hrs confidence:
| prior art document handling rörande teknikens ståndpunkt Explanation: "Prior art" heter på svenska "teknikens ståndpunkt". Saxat från http://www.prv.se/om_prv/ordlista/p-t.html : "teknikens ståndpunkt är helt enkelt all hittills känd teknik. Vid patentbarhetsbedömningar utgår man från teknikens ståndpunkt för att kunna avgöra om uppfinningen lever upp till kraven om "nyhet" och "uppfinningshöjd"." Saxat från http://www.iusmentis.com/patents/priorart/ "While there are many different grounds on which a patent can be invalidated, the most common one is that the invention is found to be not novel or obvious in the light of the prior art. As the claims are used to define the scope of protection granted by a patent, this can only occur if the patent's claims are not novel or obvious. So, to get a patent invalidated, the first step is to locate documents that can be considered "prior art" against the patent's claims. Prior art basically means any disclosure of the contents of a claim, prior to the application for patent. National patent laws provide various definitions of what constitutes prior art and in which situations. For example, not all countries recognize oral disclosures as prior art, and others provide grace periods during which the inventor may publish his invention without the publication counting as prior art against his later patent application. Additionally, the Paris Convention provides so-called priority rights, which give an inventor one year to file patent applications after he filed the first one, without endangering the novelty of his invention." Man hänvisar alltså till teknikens nuvarande nivå för att avslå patentansökningen - den anses inte tillföra något nytt till redan existerande vetande/teknik. Reference: http://www.iusmentis.com/patents/priorart/ Reference: http://www.prv.se/om_prv/ordlista/p-t.html |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
KudoZ™ translation help
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also:
Search millions of term translations