16:07 Dec 26, 2009 |
English to Russian translations [PRO] Science - Psychology / когнитивная психология | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Elena Vvedenskaya Russian Federation Local time: 04:38 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +2 | Влияние технологии на графическую систему коммуникации |
| ||
3 | влияние технологии на письменность (графическое выражение) |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
В другом названии подсказка, автор, похоже, один |
|
notational impacts of technology влияние технологии на письменность (графическое выражение) Explanation: ** |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
notational impacts of technology Влияние технологии на графическую систему коммуникации Explanation: или нотационную систему В психологическом тексте слово нотация и нотационный будут понятны, также как и когнитивный и т.п. |
| ||||||||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||||||||
|
3 hrs peer agreement (net): +1 |
Reference: В другом названии подсказка, автор, похоже, один Reference information: Effects of Technology on Verbal and Visual-Spatial Abilities David D. Preiss, Ph.D. & Robert J. Sternberg, Ph.D. We argue that, although human intelligence has an innate component, artifact-free abilities do not exist. To advance this argument, we draw attention to the two main features of technologies: Their role as amplifiers of human abilities and their mixed nature as both material and conceptual entities. To illustrate the impact of cognitive technologies, we discuss how they influence verbal skills via notational technologies and fluid skills via visual–spatial technologies. We then approach computerization from the advantaged view of its impact on both visual–spatial and conventional literacy skills. We conclude by underlining the dynamic and context-dependent nature of human ability. To successfully adapt to its cultural niche, human intelligence engages with different cognitive tools and gains a complexity larger than the one it supposedly reaches in its development according to g-factor theories. http://www.cognitivetechnologyjournal.com/abstractsSpring06.... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.