we will always have paris

12:59 Dec 15, 2018 

If I was the translator, I would go for something like this:
کاری کنیم که فقط یک خاطره از این قانون باقی بماند و مانند آن جمله معروف در فیلم کازابلانکا بگوییم، خاطره پاریس برای همیشه در قلب ما خواهد ماند.
Or
داوری بین المللی نباید بر پایه جمله معروف فیلم کازابلانکا که گفت خاطره پاریس در قلب ما خواهد ماند به یک خاطره تبدیل شو.
Or anything that keeps both quote from the movie and offers a more legal interpretation.

12:32 Dec 15, 2018 

خواهش میکنم. چنانچه ترجمه بهتری جایی پیدا کردید لطفا در همین قسمت بحث به اشتراک بگذارید. در ضمن میتونید در صورت تمایل از بین پاسخ های داده شده هم انتخاب کنید.
امیدوارم که مفید بوده باشه.

10:09 Dec 15, 2018 

The answer that the researcher gives to the above-mentioned question, should setting aside the arbitration award be abolished, is NO. And the point he makes in the end, "it cannot be correct that international arbitration would have
to operate on the basis of the famous line in the 1942 movie Casablanca: ‘We’ll
always have Paris."
Simply put, it says setting aside the award should not be abolished. So we shouldn't just abolish it and say Ahhh good memories! The point that it makes with the quote from the movie is that the abolishment should not take place and we should not end it, like the romance between the two characters, and say good old days! But now we are done and arbitration award is a thing of the past now. It's history. Nope. So something like: همه ما این قانون را به خاطر خواهیم داشت. یاد این قانون در خاطره ما باقی خواهد ماند. Or in case you want to keep the flavour from the movie, you can use the word "Paris" and either give a quote or leave it to the reader.

Hope this has been helpful.

10:01 Dec 15, 2018 

The whole text is taken from an article by Albert Jan van den Berg, retrievable from here:
https://www.arbitration-icca.org/media/4/92247683911386/medi...

The article talks about the question: Should setting aside the arbitral award be abolished. Well, a few points are to be made clear. First, what is an arbitral award? According to Wiki, An arbitration award is a determination on the merits by an arbitration tribunal in an arbitration, and is analogous to a judgment in a court of law. It is referred to as an 'award' even where all of the claimant's claims fail, or the award is of a non-monetary nature...
See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitration_award

The second question is about setting aside: Setting aside an award means to annul it, to make it invalid or void. " a successful challenge will usually result in the award being ‘set aside,’ ‘vacated,’ or’ annulled,’ and therefore ceasing to exist, at least within the jurisdiction of the court setting it aside."
See here: https://works.bepress.com/fernando_leila/2/

So far it simply means to annul a decision made by an arbitration.

09:23 Dec 15, 2018 

So, the answer to the question of this lecture seems to be ‘no’. However,
I would not propose to relapse to complacency. I do think that we can live in a
better arbitration world. The length of this lecture already demonstrates that the
current status of setting aside in international arbitration requires a lot of
explaining. This is due in part to the limited scope and outdated provisions of the
New York Convention and the copying of the New York Convention into the
UNCITRAL Model Law. I genuinely believe that we can do better. I hope that
the various options for possible solutions which I mentioned can be explored
further. In the end, it cannot be correct that international arbitration would have
to operate on the basis of the famous line in the 1942 movie Casablanca: ‘We’ll
always have Paris.’

09:09 Dec 15, 2018 

سلام لطفاً لینک یا منبع متنتون رو به اشتراک بگذارید.
متشکرم.