context setter
German translation: Strukturträger
| 17:56 Mar 19, 2012 |
| English to German translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Management / Trainings für Manager | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: thefastshow Germany Local time: 22:17 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of answers provided | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 +1 | Kontext-Macher |
| ||
| 3 | Strukturträger |
|
| Summary of reference entries provided | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reed et al. - Beschreibung der Interessensgruppen |
|
| Discussion entries: 4 | |
|---|---|
Answers
2 hrs confidence: 
Strukturträger Explanation: Schwierig, schwierig.. inspiriert von Susan Strange's Begriff der "strukturellen Macht" http://powerstructureresearch.wordpress.com/psr/ und den gefundenen, teils hier geposteten Definitionen von context setter, möchte ich den Begriff Strukturträger hier einfügen. Die context setter können sowohl Banken als auch andere große Körper sein, die das Projekt finanzieren oder anderweitig ein Fundament /eine Arena bieten auf der ein Projekt aufgebaut werden kann. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
19 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +1
peer agreement (net): +1Kontext-Macher Explanation: alternativ evtl. Kontext-Führer Angesichts der bisher aufgeführten Alternativen schlage ich vor, doch nahe am Original zu bleiben, auch wenn der Begriff nicht sehr geläufig ist und sich auf journalistische, wirtschaftspolitische und familientherapeutische Themen zu beschränken scheint. http://www.gesis.org/sowiport/search/id/iz-solis-90193360 http://blogs.taz.de/hausblog/2011/07/07/erotischer_journalis... http://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/7668.php Die Gruppe der Kontext-Macher zielt auf die Weiterentwicklung und Behütung des philosophischen und realen Bezugsrahmens ab und bewahrt dadurch ihre Macht. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Reference comments
1 hr |
| Reference: Reed et al. - Beschreibung der Interessensgruppen Reference information: Stakeholders can be classified with an ‘‘interest – influence’’ matrix, which displays their attributes and inter-relationships. Reed et al. (2009, pp. 9-10) classifies stakeholders into four groups (Figure 4) based on their importance and influence, which facilitates identifying the level of involvement. Key players are the most important stakeholders (usually farmers, nature protection administration, etc) and should be present at any time. Context setters (usually local authorities, ministries, agencies and state institutes, local celebrities, local media, officials, business/trade union leaders, etc.) are those stakeholders with much power but little interest in the process, and they should be also always present but in lower numbers/ with less representatives. Subjects are those that have much interest but little power (NGOs, scientists, recreational users, affected local residents) and it is recommended that their representatives are present. Finally, Crowd (remaining local residents) is defined as those stakeholders that have neither much power nor much interest. This last group could be just informed about the process since interests might change over time. --- zitiert auf Seite 12: Reference: http://www2.ioer.de/download/habit-change/HABIT-CHANGE%20Sta... |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.
KudoZ™ translation help
The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.
See also:
Search millions of term translations