GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
16:00 Dec 13, 2016 |
English to Dutch translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Finance (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Kitty Brussaard Netherlands Local time: 01:54 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | indirect leiding geven/indirect leidinggevende |
| ||
3 | (een) indirecte rapportagerelatie (hebben/onderhouden) |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
skip level vs direct |
|
Discussion entries: 11 | |
---|---|
indirect leiding geven/indirect leidinggevende Explanation: Familieleden mogen niet direct of indirect leiding geven aan de werknemer in kwestie. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 3 days17 hrs (2016-12-17 09:35:33 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- N.a.v. toelichting van de vragensteller en de opmerking van Barend hieronder, kan (eerste) tussen haakjes worden toegevoegd voor indirect, zodat duidelijk is dat een familielid hoger in de hiërarchie wel mag. Example sentence(s):
https://www.computable.nl/artikel/opinie/loopbaan/3465123/1509029/kritieke-momenten-in-de-ict-loopbaan.html |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
(being in a) skip-level reporting relationship (een) indirecte rapportagerelatie (hebben/onderhouden) Explanation: Zie ook de discussie en aanvullende contextinformatie in de D-box. XXX prohibits family members from being in a direct or skip-level reporting relationship. >> (Het beleid van) XXX staat niet toe dat familieleden een directe of indirecte rapportagerelatie hebben/onderhouden met andere familieleden. Het aantal hiërarchische niveaus tussen de betrokken familieleden is daarbij niet relevant (en niet noodzakelijkerwijs beperkt tot één). Zie in dit verband de verwijzing naar 'any other Manager in their chain of command' in de direct volgende zin. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
2 days 5 hrs peer agreement (net): +1 |
Reference: skip level vs direct Reference information: 2. Francis DeMonte (Wilberger) Mr. DeMonte’s initial write‐up was found to have deficiencies in competencies B (assessing the achievement of an entity’s objectives), D (understanding transaction streams and information systems), and F (decision making, problem solving and critical thinking in the context of analysis). Additionally, there was a skip‐level reporting relationship between Mr. DeMonte and his supervisor. After follow‐up contact with Cambia, Mr. Wilberger found that the designated supervisor did directly supervise Mr. Demonte’s work. Follow‐up responses on the competencies in question were more detailed, and Mr. Wilberger felt that there was enough information to recommend Mr. DeMonte for licensure. Mr. Wilberger confirmed that Mr. DeMonte completed Cambia’s MOU program. https://www.oregon.gov/boa/docs/Agendas Minutes/QC/01-15-1... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.