verzekering voor rekening van wie het behoort,

English translation: at the expense of the owner

22:29 Jan 15, 2008
Dutch to English translations [PRO]
Bus/Financial - Insurance / Belgian
Dutch term or phrase: verzekering voor rekening van wie het behoort,
De huurder verzekert de gebouwen voor rekening van wie het behoort.

this seems to mean that the owner gets the payout, not the lessee. but how to say that in English?
Andre de Vries
United Kingdom
Local time: 17:43
English translation:at the expense of the owner
Explanation:
It means that the renter insures the building(s) but the owner pays for it. In that case the owner does not (have to) insure the building if it is not rented.
Selected response from:

Tina Vonhof (X)
Canada
Local time: 10:43
Grading comment
Selected automatically based on peer agreement.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
4 +6at the expense of the owner
Tina Vonhof (X)


  

Answers


24 mins   confidence: Answerer confidence 4/5Answerer confidence 4/5 peer agreement (net): +6
at the expense of the owner


Explanation:
It means that the renter insures the building(s) but the owner pays for it. In that case the owner does not (have to) insure the building if it is not rented.

Tina Vonhof (X)
Canada
Local time: 10:43
Native speaker of: Native in DutchDutch, Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 14
Grading comment
Selected automatically based on peer agreement.

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Kate Hudson (X)
36 mins
  -> Thank you Kate.

agree  Siobhan Schoonhoff-Reilly
1 hr
  -> Thank you Siobhan.

agree  D.K. Tannwitz
2 hrs
  -> Thanks WIDIC.

agree  Rrunner (X)
2 hrs
  -> Thank you Les.

agree  L.J.Wessel van Leeuwen
8 hrs
  -> Thanks L.J.

neutral  jarry (X): I think that should be 'for the benefit of the owner'landlord'. OK, but does it make sense for a tenant to take out a policy which the landlord could (presumably) contract himself? That would be risky would it not?
9 hrs
  -> It's possible, Jarry, but why would a renter agree to that? Note added: because then the owner would not have to have insurance when the building is empty./ Yes, it would be risky.

agree  reveti
4 days
  -> Thank you. As pointed out by Jarry, there are some questions that can only be solved by looking further at the context.
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search