19:00 Jun 10, 2013
I see what you mean.
Your second interpretation is the correct one.
As far as your first interpretation is concerned, this should have required a slightly different phrasing, for example:
Spiegels, verlichtingsappendages e.d. mogen niet anders op de veiligheidsbeugel aangebracht worden dan door verklemming. --> Spiegels, verlichtingsappendages e.d. mogen niet op de veiligheidsbeugel aangebracht worden anders dan (gevaar voor) verklemming.
You are thinking these 'protusions' (Spiegels, verlichtingsappendages) may cause jamming ('verklemming') in narrow passages for example.
As to the reason why they should only be attached by means of clamping, I don't know, but it could be that other attachment methods are too rigid in case of 'verklemming' :-) |