00:09 Dec 18, 2004 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Social Sciences - Social Science, Sociology, Ethics, etc. | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: bigedsenior Local time: 02:08 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 +5 | see explanation |
| ||
3 +4 | see links |
| ||
3 +1 | power dynamics |
| ||
3 | any relationship that contains controversy (push & pull) |
|
any relationship that contains controversy (push & pull) Explanation: '' -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2004-12-18 00:35:19 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- it is a most debated subject, philosophically. here\'s ONE definition. \"A working definition of power relations that distinguishes them from causation without losing their similarities is that Power relations are what enable who to do what to whom. rather than \"who does what to whom.\" A more structurally explicit and useful definition is: Power relations are the matrix of possible actors and their possible interactions. \" |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
see links Explanation: i think it's all that you've already mentioned, depending on who uses the concept and in what context. you may find these Foucault links useful. Reference: http://www.sla.purdue.edu/academic/engl/theory/newhistoricis... Reference: http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Speech/rccs/theory54.htm |
| |