GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
19:35 Apr 1, 2020 |
English to Serbian translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: LogosART Croatia Local time: 09:26 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | pravna pitanja, pravni elementi |
| ||
3 +1 | Revizija |
| ||
4 | primena materijalnog ili procesnog prava |
|
pravna pitanja, pravni elementi Explanation: pravni elementi 27. | Kao drugo, žalitelji u biti navode da je Opći sud povrijedio članak 47. Povelje ( 17 ) i načelo kontradiktornosti, kao i članak 92. stavak 1. Poslovnika Općeg suda ( 18 ). Prema mišljenju žaliteljâ, koji osobito navode presudu od 21. veljače 2013., Banif Plus Bank, (C‑472/11, EU:C:2013:88, t. 29.), ( 19 ) za zadovoljavanje zahtjeva koji se odnose na pravo na pravično suđenje važno je da su stranke bile upoznate s kako činjeničnim tako i pravnim elementima koji su odlučujući za stvar u postupku te da su o njima mogle raspravljati kontradiktorno. 27. | In the second place, the appellants allege, in essence, that the General Court infringed Article 47 of the Charter ( 17 ) and the principle that both sides must be heard, and Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court. ( 18 ) According to the appellants, who cite inter alia the judgment of 21 February 2013, Banif Plus Bank (C‑472/11, EU:C:2013:88, paragraph 29), ( 19 ) in order to meet the requirements associated with the right to a fair hearing, it is important for the parties to be aware of and to be able to discuss in adversarial proceedings both the facts and the points of law which are crucial. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN-HR/TXT/?uri=CELEX... pravna pitanja Opinion of the advocate general: in approximately half of all cases the advocate general delivers an opinion. If the case raises no new points of law the Court may decide that an opinion is not necessary. Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika: u približno polovici predmeta, nezavisni odvjetnik iznosi mišljenje. Ako predmet ne potakne pravna pitanja, Sud može odlučiti da mišljenje nije potrebno. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN-HR/TXT/?uri=LEGIS... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
points of law Revizija Explanation: Revizija (sudskog predmeta) Ceo termin na engleskom je zapravo – ‘appeal on points of law’ (because there are no new facts/omission of significant evidence/negligence; following the trial verdict, direct appeal, i.e. appeal on points of law, generally only looks at "legal error", no jury or witnesses testifying) a deo koji ste vi tražili bi podrazumevao ‘pravni osnov’ To bi u našem zakonu bila revizija. Revizija protiv presude je i kod nas strogo formalan akt i postojanje pravnog osnova u predmetima predstavlja preduslov njenog pokretanja. To znači da je isključivo došlo ili do pogrešne primene materijalnog prava ili do apsolutno bitnih povreda odredaba ZPP RS. Shodno tome, ceo engleski termin možete da prevedete samo kao ‘revizija’ jer se zna šta to u pravnom smislu podrazumeva. http://www.zastupnik.gov.rs/uploads/cr/presude/u-odnosu-na-r... (engleska verzija str.17, srpska verzija str.6) |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
points of law primena materijalnog ili procesnog prava Explanation: GLOSSARY of the European Convention on Human Rights - GLOSAR Evropske Konvencije o ljudskim pravima appeal on a point of law - pravni lek kojim se osporava primena materijalnog ili procesnog prava https://rm.coe.int/16806f0dd4 |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.