GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
12:00 Dec 11, 2019 |
Arabic to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / court language | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: mohamed aglan Egypt Local time: 16:21 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Nullification of Judgment due to Discrpancy between Grounds and Wording of the Court Sentence Explanation: Nullification of Judgment due to Discrpancy between Grounds and Wording of the Court Sentence |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Null judgment for inconsistence of causes and ruling pronouncement Explanation: The judgment is declared null for the conflict of causes and ruling pronouncement. The judgment is declared null for the inconsistence of causes and ruling pronouncement. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
invalidity of the judgement due to contradiction between the grounds and operative part of judgement Explanation: منطوق الحكم: "operative part of judgement" الأسباب: "grounds" |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Judgment cancellation due to the contradiction of causes and exact sense (of words) Explanation: exact sense (of words)=مَنْطُوق contradiction of causes :تناقض الأسباب Judgment cancellation :بطلان الحكم ببطلان الحكم لتناقض الأسباب والمنطوق : Judgment cancellation due to the contradiction of causes and exact sense (of words) Example sentence(s):
|
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
void judgment for the contradiction between the causes and the operative provisions/rulings Explanation: والله أعلم -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 5 hrs (2019-12-11 17:09:41 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Void judgment for the contradiction between the causes and the operative provisions/rulings. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
The invalidity of the judgement due to the inconsistent reasons and enunciation Explanation: the Arabic expression means that sentencing the accused man/woman is not valid because there's a sort of contradiction in what is said to the court. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.