subject to no unique defenses
Spanish translation: no sujeto a defensa original diferenciada del resto
| 19:21 Sep 24, 2019 |
| English to Spanish translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / class action | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: Chema Nieto Castañón Spain Local time: 03:35 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| Summary of reference entries provided | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| What is a unique defense? |
|
Answers
6 mins confidence: 
no está supeditada a acciones separadas/independientes Explanation: Mi propuesta. https://definicion.de/supeditado/ |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
7 hrs confidence:
no sujeto a defensa original diferenciada del resto Explanation: El original se refiere a esta idea: (...) no unique defenses exist that would otherwise preclude typicality In short, the Court finds that Lead Plaintiffs and the putative class share a common legal theory, based on Defendants' material omissions. Additionally, no unique defenses exist that would otherwise preclude typicality. As such, the Court is satisfied that Lead Plaintiffs have fulfilled Rule 23(a)(3)'s typicality requirement. https://casetext.com/case/bing-ex-rel-situated-v-aeterna-zen... Donde el concepto de typicality resulta particularmente revelador; The typicality criterion focuses on whether there exists a relationship between the plaintiff’s claims and the claims alleged on behalf of the class. https://www.google.es/amp/s/www.classactiondefenseblog.com/a... Con esto, is subject to no unique defenses podría expresarse, pej, (...) [el representante de la demanda conjunta] no está sujeto a defensa original diferenciada del resto |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
8 hrs confidence:
no es pasible de oposición de excepciones personales / especiales Explanation: En base a la investigación de Robert (la cual creo muy acertada) he borrado mi propuesta anterior y la he sustituido por esta otra que creo que refleja el concepto fielmente. Les mando saludos y espero que les guste. |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
Reference comments
2 hrs peer agreement (net): +4 |
| Reference: What is a unique defense? Reference information: Named Plaintiff Subject To Unique Defense Is Not Adequate Class Representatives In CE Design Ltd. v. King Architectural Metals, Inc., No. 10-8050, 2011 WL 938900 (7th Cir. Mar. 18, 2011), the Seventh Circuit addressed a complaint brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by a company that, “unusually for a business firm, is an avid class-action plaintiff,” having filed at least 150 TCPA class actions. The Seventh Circuit vacated class certification, finding a plaintiff cannot be an adequate class representative if it is subject to a defense that would not defeat the claims of unnamed class members. Here, CE Design had agreed to the publication of its fax number in a business directory that could be deemed to constitute consent to the receipt of faxes. Under the TCPA, consent is a defense to a TCPA claim. Thus, the court remanded the matter to the district court to address whether the fact that the named class representative’s claim was significantly weaker than claims of other class members justified the denial of certification. https://jenner.com/resource_centers/update/72 So "not subject to unique defenses" means that the class representative's claims could not be countered using a defense (excepción) that does not apply to the other class members. There's probably a number of ways to translate it, but it needs an explanatory approach, I think. |
| |
