obligation de veille

13:16 Jul 20, 2019 

'is not bound to perform a duty of vigilance over any use...'

07:11 Jul 20, 2019 

.... is/are under no obligation/not required, however, to check that third parties [(e.g.) do not misuse...]. Just thought I'd contibute this - made up/borrowed from various answers below.

06:52 Jul 20, 2019 

It really would help if you could confirm what the context is here: retail, or other?
Typically, at the checkout, the cashier will check that the money-off coupon is still in date, and usually applies to a product that has been actually purchased; but sometimes, people may try and pass a coupon when they haven't bought the actual product, or will photocopy a coupon and try and use it on several different occasions; the shop cannot necessarily police this sort of abuse.

06:49 Jul 20, 2019 

What you are forgetting is that here it is negative: they DON'T have to do this! Therefore any mention of 'utmost care' is at best pointless, and at worst, slightly risible.

23:21 Jul 19, 2019 

Veiller sur : Surveiller attentivement, prendre soin
Syn : Protéger, s'occuper activement, parer, se précautionner, faire grande attention

Maybe - "...duty to exercise the utmost care to prevent/avoid any irregular practices"

22:30 Jul 19, 2019 

would be with someone checking tickets at the entrance of some event.

That person would be expected to be vigilant - not let in people with blatantly fake / not valid tickets or tickets that are in someone else's name.

Saying that that person is "supervising" anything or that it's a kind of "watchdog" role would be in my perception silly overkill.

22:04 Jul 19, 2019 

A vouched giving you the right to a rebate / reduction /discount ... Never been offered one?

19:30 Jul 19, 2019 

Assuming this is retail, then a 'bon de réduction' is not a 'rebate voucher', but rather a simple 'money-off coupon' — hence the danger why people mgiuht try and cheat with them.

18:27 Jul 19, 2019 

(What's a rebate voucher btw?)

18:26 Jul 19, 2019 

Regulators in the UK are called watchdogs -- is there a moralistic connotation there? And of course catching people cheating does naturally have a moralistic aspect.

And minor cheating? A clever discount voucher scam might yield thousands or tens of thousands of euros of profits.

17:46 Jul 19, 2019 

that makes little sense here - you wouldn't put a "watchdog" in charge of stopping minor cheating with "Bons de Réduction" (rebate vouchers?).

16:23 Jul 19, 2019 

I came up with "watchdog obligation". Any comments, positive or negative?

Personally I think that the party should be incentivised to have precisely such an obligation.

Of course you can never be completely original:

https://www.google.com/search?q="watchdog obligation"&oq="wa...