14:34 Jan 30, 2018 |
English to Russian translations [PRO] Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Vladimir Alekseev, MCIL | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | см. ниже |
| ||
3 | спрос [в основном] на комплексные услуги |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
группирование спросов (товаров) по критериям |
|
спрос [в основном] на комплексные услуги Explanation: The Demand Supply Governance Framework - Menzo Meijer, Marco van der Haar, Jork Lousberg - Google Books https://books.google.com/books?id=vudEBAAAQBAJ&pg=PR5&lpg=PR... Как нетрудно понять из контекста, речь идет о спросе предприятий (business demand). -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 10 hrs (2018-01-31 01:07:32 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Наглядный пример supply bundling (правда, речь идет о потребительском продукте): Microsoft litigation - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_litigation#Spanish_a... == BEGIN QUOTE == Anti-trust <...> After bundling the Internet Explorer web browser into its Windows operating system in the late 1990s (without requiring a separate purchase) and acquiring a dominant share in the web browser market, the antitrust case United States v. Microsoft was brought against the company. In a series of rulings by judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, the company was found to have violated its earlier consent decree and abused its monopoly in the desktop operating systems market. The "findings of fact" during the antitrust case established that Microsoft has a monopoly in the PC desktop operating systems market:[6] Viewed together, three main facts indicate that Microsoft enjoys monopoly power. First, Microsoft's share of the market for Intel-compatible PC operating systems is extremely large and stable. Second, Microsoft's dominant market share is protected by a high barrier to entry. Third, and largely as a result of that barrier, Microsoft's customers lack a commercially viable alternative to Windows. (III.34) == END QUOTE == -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 10 hrs (2018-01-31 01:08:48 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Перепутал ссылку: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_litigation#Anti-trus... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 11 hrs (2018-01-31 01:52:08 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Снимаю свой ответ как ошибочный. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
см. ниже Explanation: если увеличение спроса, приходящегося на продукцию доминирующей на рынке компании, приводит к непропорциональному ограничению коммерческих возможностей компаний-конкурентов речь идет о том, что из-за системы скидок все покупатели переходят к доминирующей на рынке компании (резко возрастает спрос на их товары/услуги), как следствие, нарушается конкуренция |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
40 mins peer agreement (net): +1 |
Reference: группирование спросов (товаров) по критериям Reference information: группирование спросов (товаров) по критериям Example sentence(s):
https://help.sap.com/viewer/5edf2b0f8ce54c599c2f08565e4373c4/1.3/en-US/6b70d0512a94f33ae10000000a44176d.html |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.