GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
22:06 Nov 14, 2017 |
French to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law: Contract(s) / Contrat de cession | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: B D Finch France Local time: 09:38 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +5 | ln the event of X's or Y's liability being invoked |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
En cas de recherches de responsabilité ln the event of X's or Y's liability being invoked Explanation: This is about limiting the parties' liabilities to the value of the contract. There might be a better way of putting it. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 day 19 hrs (2017-11-16 17:32:38 GMT) Post-grading -------------------------------------------------- http://e-lawresources.co.uk/Rylands-v-Fletcher.php "There must be an escape from the defendant's land. An injury inflicted by the accumulation of a hazardous substance on the land itself will not invoke liability under Rylands v Fletcher: Ponting v Noakes (1849) 2 QB 281 Case Summary" http://www.ssr.co.uk/frontdoor/resources/1366989729-weightma... "Clause 61 will prevent a claimant pleading breach of a statutory duty as a cause of action in any claim for personal injury. As certain statutory duties invoke strict liability, such as:- Regulation 5 of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 – failing to keep the workplace in good repair; Regulation 4 of the Provision & Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 – liability for defective equipment, not kept in good repair; the clause in effect abolishes the concept of strict liability, by allowing an employer (and therefore their insurers) to prove they took all reasonably practicable measures, and therefore were not at fault. " https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/6-608-0506 Only the company itself can invoke this liability. Directors may be further held jointly and severally liable for all damages caused by a breach of ... -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 day 19 hrs (2017-11-16 17:33:57 GMT) Post-grading -------------------------------------------------- www.cambridge.org/download_file/view/909207/ The following relationships do not invoke vicarious liability: • local authority and tenants – in Hussain v Lancaster CC, 16 over 100 tenants of a Council hous-. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||