catastrophes naturelles et extensions

15:23 Jul 14, 2017 

Does there actually have to be a reason for a shooting in the US? In any case, the riots/lootings/shootings came in the aftermath of Katrina.

15:13 Jul 14, 2017 

Riots (with shootings) were consequences of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.

15:06 Jul 14, 2017 

I was hoping this wouldn't come up but, to prevent further confusion, legal US EN consequential damages isn't the same thing as consequences or resultant losses in ordinary language. I haven't researched whether dommages indirects means consequential damages but, if so, I would avoid it.

15:05 Jul 14, 2017 

The parsing is wrong. The policy wording should be read as follows: The policyholder shall insure (whatever) against certains risks (including cat. nat.) and allied risks (see philgoddard's answer), including this and that.

<p>- Le Preneur fera assurer auprès de compagnies notoirement solvables, pour des sommes suffisantes,
- les agencements (+ …)
- contre les risques d'incendie, (de)... (et de) catastrophes naturelles
- et [contre les] extensions [de ces risques],
- y compris [parmi ces extensions] émeutes, +…malveillance et sabotage ainsi que le recours des voisins et des tiers.

14:57 Jul 14, 2017 

but asker has to agree too before anyone can change it

14:53 Jul 14, 2017 

I think this should be listed as an 'Insurance' question, rather than 'Real Estate' (even though this is what the source text is about).

14:51 Jul 14, 2017 

How can a riot be the consequence or extension of a natural disaster? It's more likely to occur in the aftermath.

14:24 Jul 14, 2017 

You've actually used "extensions" in your explanation, and that is the answer in my opinion. Consequential losses are pertes/dommages indirects.

12:40 Jul 14, 2017 

In the European and Turkish insurance markets, extension often refers to what would be called a rider in the US, except that in Europe extensions for natural disasters are mandated as part of statutory schemes prescribing the terms of a basic insurance policy.The drafter might have slipped this word into the ST incongruously among the list of possible mishaps. Doesn't make sense, but possible. Otherwise I would agree with Wendy - consequential losses or whatever.

12:35 Jul 14, 2017 

catastrophes naturelles et extensions, y compris ...

12:34 Jul 14, 2017 

their aftermath?