This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
This question was closed without grading. Reason: Errant question
English to Italian translations [PRO] General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters / science, physics, quantum
English term or phrase:at a time
Imagine a stream of particles moving around my ring of niobium metal. I want to know each particle’s momentum, but I can’t measure it directly, as that would affect the result. So I first “pre-select” a particular state for the particles. This is like applying a filter. I’m going to choose to deal only with particles that are moving clockwise around the ring. Next I perform a series of weak measurements on each of the particles, gently probing the property I am interested in – the momentum – without disturbing them. The final act is to make a strong measurement on each of the particles. Then I look at the state each one is now in. Is it still travelling clockwise, or has it been so disturbed by the final measurement that it is now travelling anticlockwise? Now for the analysis to find the momentum of these quantum particles. The first thing to do is to discard all the particles that weren’t properly disturbed in the final measurement. I “post-select”, keeping only those that are now travelling anticlockwise. Aharonov showed that quantum statistics can accurately infer their momentum at a time before they were disturbed.