peremptory against us

18:55 Mar 30, 2017 

no to wytłumaczenie ma sens i chyba będzie o to chodziło skoro mają dostarczyć dokumenty- dziękuję za cenne wskazówki

14:42 Mar 30, 2017 

A matter may be marked as being peremptory as against one or both parties. The possible sanction for failure to comply is likely to be that the court will deny any future adjournment requests treating any absence as a failure to attend.

https://www.mylegalbriefcase.com/lawyertalk/116/papers-on-th...

14:42 Mar 30, 2017 

In some cases – especially after a number of previous adjournments or with self-represented parties – consent may not be forthcoming for an adjournment request. The court will normally grant one or two adjournments of a settlement conference for any reasonable cause. However, if a party believes that another party is abusing this, the solution is to only consent to an adjournment if it is marked 'peremptory' against the party requesting it.

'Peremptory' is a code word used by the court to indicate that a party has used up any leeway that the court is prepared to grant. It effectively means that no further adjournment requests will be considered from a person against whom the matter has been marked as being peremptory. Ultimately, it is up to every judge to decide how they will rule in a specific case; there is no provision in the rules for how a noting of 'peremptory' must be handled and, accordingly, it is possible that a subsequent judge might still grant a further adjournment. This, though, should not be counted on.
(...)

14:33 Mar 30, 2017 

nie jestem oczywiście pewien, ale "marked peremtory" rozumiem że wyznaczony termin jest terminem ostatecznym, bez mozliwości dalszego odroczenia na wniosek obrony bez wzgledu czy będzie czy nie będzie w posiadaniu potrzebnych dokumentów. Z ta tez data zapadne ostateczne roztrzygniecie.

14:22 Mar 30, 2017 

no właśnie nie bardzo mi to pasuje, skoro sprawa została odroczona na inny termin to przecież nie jest ostatecznie rozstrzygnięta