false or misleading indications of origin or statements of fact

23:27 Jul 15, 2016 

So would I. Am just trying to think of plausible explanation considering the "discussion forum" context.

22:29 Jul 15, 2016 

Oh wow - yes, you are right, it makes much more sense now! Thank you! I have contacted my client meanwhile - I 'm waiting for an answer - but I think this is how I should understand the text.

22:20 Jul 15, 2016 

makes reference to "materials"
-You are solely responsible for the content and context of any materials
-[...]publish through the websites any materials which:
I would think that "false or misleading indication of origin or statements of facts" makes reference to the "materials" (i.e. to attribute a quote to somebody when that person never said it, etc.)
Maybe? My two cents ;-)

16:24 Jul 15, 2016 

I would normally take "indication of origin" to mean "where this product comes from".

16:11 Jul 15, 2016 

Thank you both! I will ask the client - maybe it was cut and pasted, that's what I thought, too.

15:43 Jul 15, 2016 

where you come from (origin) and you must be truthful.

?

15:42 Jul 15, 2016 

Maybe it's been cut and pasted from somewhere else, because it doesn't make sense in this context. If you're translating it into Romanian, I'd say something like "false or misleading information" for the whole of the text in bold.

15:13 Jul 15, 2016 

No - that's why it doesn't make sense - it's about a discussion forum.

15:01 Jul 15, 2016 

What kind of website is it? Something to do with buying and selling?