12:02 Jul 9, 2016 |
English to Russian translations [PRO] Safety / drug testing | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Natalie Poland Local time: 05:40 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +3 | допуск к секретным материалам по вопросам национальной безопасности |
| ||
4 | см. |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
допуск к секретным материалам по вопросам национальной безопасности Explanation: * -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 14 мин (2016-07-09 12:16:15 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- To: Asker Вам, конечно, виднее. Только почему "ДОПИНГ-КОНТРОЛЬ" (а не проверка сотрудников с допуском на употребление НАРКОТИКОВ)? -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 7 час (2016-07-09 19:41:12 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- To: ASKER А вот что говорится в самом начале материалов по делу 'Hartness 1990 D.C. Circuit': 919 F.2d 170 287 U.S.App.D.C. 61, 5 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 1613, 1990 O.S.H.D. (CCH) P 29,146 Norman HARTNESS, et al. v. George BUSH, President of the United States, et al., Appellants. No. 90-5050. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Sept. 7, 1990. Decided Nov. 16, 1990. ... This appeal challenges a preliminary injunction that, as modified by the district court, forbids a number of agencies in the Executive Office of the President ("EOP") from conducting random urinalysis drug-testing of employees with "secret" national security clearances. 712 F.Supp. 986. We hold that the prior decisions of the Supreme Court and of this court establish the validity of random drug testing of such personnel and, therefore, reverse the district court's decision. https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F2/919/919.F2d... |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||