GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
08:09 Mar 25, 2015 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Law/Patents - Government / Politics / European Union | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Martin Riordan Brazil Local time: 13:39 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +4 | above and beyond the percentage provided in these articles |
|
additional to these articles above and beyond the percentage provided in these articles Explanation: The author is saying that the 18% mentioned in the "proposal" is not in addition to the 10% of art. 14 or 20% of art. 21. That is, the interpretation should not permit 28% or 38%. I agree that the words you have placed in [] improve the original text and would seem to be necessary. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||