GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
12:14 Apr 25, 2014 |
German to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / Legal judgement | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Kim Metzger Mexico Local time: 15:33 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +1 | predicate activity |
| ||
3 | (AE & BE) background evidence |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
Question |
| ||
Previous question (by Kim) |
|
predicate activity Explanation: I think this should work for a fraud case too. A distinction must be drawn between the two types of knowledge implicated by the money laundering statute. While to sustain a conviction the defendant must have known that the primary predicate activity (in this case securities, mail and wire fraud) was unlawful, see United States v. Montoya, 945 F.2d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir.1991), he need not have known that the secondary act of laundering the proceeds was unlawful. http://openjurist.org/37/f3d/1407/united-states-v-v-stein Drafting Note: A number of common law countries, for instance the United Kingdom and South Africa, make it clear in their legislation that benefits of criminal conduct include property obtained “in connection with” the offense. Adding this phrase expands the concept of proceeds somewhat. It should, for in stance, make it clear in the case of a stand-alone money laundering prosecution where there is no prosecution for the predicate offence that the funds being laundered which may be viewed primarily as proceeds of the predicate activity are also considered proceeds of the money laundering offence. https://www.imolin.org/pdf/imolin/Model_Provisions_Final.pdf |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
(AE & BE) background evidence Explanation: Not the same as SFE= similar fact evidence and could work for fraud or embezzlement. See the unreported EN case of R. vs.Pettman (1985). Reference: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=BZ2yYTZYy3wC&pg=PA272&lpg... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
24 mins |
Reference: Question Reference information: What is the alleged offence in your case? |
| ||
Note to reference poster
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
1 hr peer agreement (net): +1 |
Reference: Previous question (by Kim) Reference information: The meaning of Vortat is discussed in detail here, with several good answers. It's a bit hard for us to suggest the right one for your context without seeing the text. Reference: http://www.proz.com/kudoz/german_to_english/law_patents/1888... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.