produits détenteurs

19:27 Jul 23, 2013 

The relevant words may be "sous entendus" or "implicites", having been mentioned earlier. This is not uncommon, even in business contracts.

13:12 Jul 23, 2013 

It's possible, but I suspect that it is unlikely. If that was the case, why would the relevant words be omitted?

12:44 Jul 23, 2013 

Could it possibly mean "produits détenteurs d'un accord (préférentiel) de distribution"? or something similar?

21:52 Jul 22, 2013 

That makes sense.

21:41 Jul 22, 2013 

After further thought, I am just wondering whether the text should perhaps more correctly read "...produits détenteurs d'un référencement commercial...". Unless anyone can suggest anything else, I will probably put this possibility to the client as are a few other typos (misspellings, rather than omissions of words, though) in the whole text, so this might just be another error!

17:51 Jul 22, 2013 

Hi Phil - Thanks for your input. The manufacturer produces clothes, so your first guess is probably very unlikely. As for your second option, I have no further information in this regard, so it's difficult to say if that is a possibility, but it might be.

17:34 Jul 22, 2013 

Is this pharmaceuticals, or some other product that requires licensing? In which case, could détenteur mean licensed?
Alternatively, could it mean stockholder, ie someone who stores stock on the company's behalf?