GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
20:29 Mar 5, 2011 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Social Sciences - International Org/Dev/Coop | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Ellen Kraus Austria Local time: 14:35 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +5 | have been the object of abrasive (or harsh) criticism |
| ||
3 | have been greeted with contempt |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
come under scornful assessments have been greeted with contempt Explanation: It suggests that those who pay attention to the accidents (General public? Pressure groups? Human rights groups?) judge that they are unnecessary and could be avoided or minimized, if so desired. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
come under scornful assessments have been the object of abrasive (or harsh) criticism Explanation: might be one of several possibilities |
| |
Grading comment
| ||