jednání v hospodářské soutěži

16:33 Dec 3, 2010 

I think that must be it Jan - but it was left out in the source text and that is why it did not make sense

16:25 Dec 3, 2010 

Charles, what you mean is shortly and simply "nekalosoutěžní jednání" having meaning according to § 44 subsection . 1 ComC
- many links

16:17 Dec 3, 2010 

Thanks to everyone for everything. My problem was that according to the Czech "jednani v hospodarske soutezi" is unfair, which is nonsense. "jednání v hospodářské soutěži [je] jednání, které může mít jakýkoliv nepříznivý vliv na hospodářskou soutěž" simply does not make sense. I understand what Jan and Maria are saying about Article 44, but the fact remains that the Czech just says "jednání v hospodářské soutěži" and not "jednani v hospodarske soutezi, ktere je v rozporu s dobrymi mravy souteze" - "jednani v hospodarske soutezi" cannot on its own/in itself be unfair or have an adverse effect on competition.... there is something missing.

15:50 Dec 3, 2010 

httpp://ec.europa.eu - "nekala soutez je v obchodnim zakoniku vymezena jako jednani v hospodarske soutezi, ktere je v rozporu s dobrymi mravy souteze".
par. 44 odst. 1 zakon c.513/1991 Sb.

jednani - dohody mezi souteziteli, rozhodnuti jejich sdruzeni a jednani soutezitelu ve vzajemne shode jejichz cilem je naruseni hospodarske souteze, jsou zakazane a neplatne.

Nekala soutez - "Unfair business practices encompass fraud, misrepresentation, and apppressive or unconsciouable acts or practices by business, often against consumers and are prohibited by law in many countries. For instance, in the EU, each member state must regulate unfair b.p. in accordance with the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, subject to transitional periods.

14:04 Dec 3, 2010 

Tento problém (dohodu o cenách, tzn. kartelové dohody) upravuje zákon o ochraně hospodářské soutěže 143/2001 Sb. Co jsou jednotlivá jednání nekalé soutěže stanoví taxativně § 44 (2) ObchZ - a) klamavá reklama atd.

13:53 Dec 3, 2010 

perhaps the unfair element is when a group of companies act together to fix prices, as a monopoly would act on its own, hence oligopoly. Sort of like OPEC. It is against the principles of competition.

09:40 Dec 3, 2010 

vypadá to na terminus technicus, nemá cenu řešit, proč to tak je, prostě to doslovně přeložit...viz 3.2.1. této bakalářské práce
http://is.muni.cz/th/170532/pravf_b/Bakalarska_prace_Zackova...

09:30 Dec 3, 2010 

§ 44 (1) Commercial Code - An unfair competition is an economic competition activity contrary to morality of the competition, which ...

It is necessary to read on ... § 44 (1) and (2)

08:50 Dec 3, 2010 

Thank you to all of you for your input. Sorry if I am being a bit stupid (it's the end of the week) but I still do not get how it is possible that jednání v hospodářské soutězi could have a nepříznivý vliv na hospodářskou soutěž...? jednání v hospodářské soutězi is surely just normal business activity isn't it....? Basically the text is saying "actions/activity in economic competition" -> maybe "adverse effect on competition"? That to my mind is illogical. If it was jednání v rozporu s hospodářskou soutězí then fine. Maria's "unfair business practices" would make sense but how do you get that from "jednání v hospodářské soutězi" (i.e. where does the "unfair" bit come from? Am I making sense?

06:50 Dec 3, 2010 

Charles, I think the key word in the sentence is "může" - if a certain activity CAN or COULD have a negative effect (depending on the way it is carried out) then it is considered jednání v hospodářské soutěži, i.e. the way I set my prices COULD have a negative effect on competition (if I set them in such a way as to harm my competitors), even if I, specifically, am setting my prices in compliance with fair business practices. The activity itself has the potential for harm if misused, so it's jednání v hospodářské soutěži. That's how I'd read it; otherwise, as you say, it doesn't make sense.