16:01 Apr 30, 2010 |
English language (monolingual) [Non-PRO] Medical - Medical (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: B D Finch France Local time: 07:49 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | reduces/d the breakdown of ... increases/d the build-up of ... |
| ||
3 +1 | ; it has been shown to increase....and.... |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
; it has been shown to increase....and.... Explanation: The verb tenses make the sentence unclear. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
reduces/d the breakdown of ... increases/d the build-up of ... Explanation: It is the wandering tenses that make it look odd. It is important to know whether the writer meant to use the present or past tense, however it seems unlikely that there is any justification for switching between them. Present tense if it is an established fact (based on various, independent tests and acceptance within the profession), past tense if it is the results of a test. The use of the phrase "the cause for" also indicates the writer is not a native speaker of English. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 17 hrs (2010-05-01 09:02:40 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- The semi-colon after the first "muscle" should be a comma and there should be a comma before "which". A comma after the second "muscle" might seem to help reading the list because of the two "and"s; however, it would lead to confusion because it would appear to be paired with the one before "which". |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.