16:20 Apr 8, 2010 |
German to English translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Engineering (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: J. Pieter Mielekamp United States Local time: 09:00 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | Reduced |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
Reduced Explanation: O Nine Tunator Resonator Cabinet. On this site: https://www.premierguitar.com/Video/20100330/984/O_Nine_Reso... In the video the creator of the cabinet tries to explain what it does, it is all about adjusting the magnet and thus the resonance. He wants to gets the signal under control and says "it has (the signal) to start and to stop at the right point, so when you stop playing it has to stop and not move further one" (He tries to reduce the resonance) Another web page describes what the cabinet magnet does: "Drawing from the design of a violin, Dietmar has come up with a cabinet that incorporates a 4-way adjustable “bracing” system for fine tuning. The tunator part of his cabinet attaches to the speaker’s magnet and to the four walls. You can then adjust the tension of the tunator to find the sweet spot according to your ears. It will also optimize sound projection and improve definition." In general I think that Reduced is the better one. Example sentence(s):
https://www.premierguitar.com/Video/20100330/984/O_Nine_Resonator_Cabinet.aspx Reference: http://www.300guitars.com/2010/04/o-nine-tunator-cabinets/ |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.