на оценку не ниже хорошо
English translation: on a higher than just satisfactory level
| 19:24 Apr 3, 2009 |
| Russian to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Education / Pedagogy | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: Michael Korovkin Italy Local time: 09:48 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
Answers
4 mins confidence: 
peer agreement (net): +1
peer agreement (net): +1to a level above standard. Explanation: Bit of a tough one since we (well in the U.K. anyway) operate on a letter grading system not the 1-5 Russian one |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | |||
1 hr confidence:
to a level good and higher Explanation: why not? |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | |||
2 hrs confidence:
with a 2.0 grade point average or better. Explanation: assuming «хорошо» a U.S. grade of "C"', оr 2.0 average. (4.0 = A; 3.0 =B; 2.0 = C; 1.0 = D, or 0.0 = F) This should be fun. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 4 hrs (2009-04-03 23:28:31 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- The grade point average explanation is incorrect in this case as Oxana has pointed out. The case in point relates to one score or grade to evaluate a given body of knowledge. I would therefore translate it as: "The candidate must score satisfactory (average - I leave that discussion open) or above...on this body of knowledge." |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | |||
4 hrs confidence:
on a higher than just satisfactory level Explanation: avoids the morass of grading system conversions |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | |||
38 mins confidence: peer agreement (net): +5
peer agreement (net): +5at a level rated not below Explanation: The trainee should have a knowledge of the provisions of the documents at a level rated not below "good" [(on a scale of poor, adequate, satisfactory, good, and excellent)]. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 40 mins (2009-04-03 20:04:40 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- The question arises: Assuming that "satisfactory plus" is below good, Is "good minus" also below good? -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 9 hrs (2009-04-04 05:22:55 GMT) Post-grading -------------------------------------------------- Asker's comment to my answer is incorrect, in my opinion as a professional who has a substantial practice in evaluation matters. My note immediately preceding is the key to why "at a level rated not below good" is the correct answer and the other answers are either incorrect or irrelevant to the context |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||