GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
02:41 Oct 11, 2006 |
Portuguese to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) / imposto | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Denise Miranda Local time: 11:28 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | not be applicable |
| ||
5 | no longer defined as |
| ||
3 | changed/modified |
|
changed/modified Explanation: changed/modified |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
not be applicable Explanation: ...shall not be relevant and shall be rendered inefficient... |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
no longer defined as Explanation: Lilian, acredito que se você inverter a ordem da sentença, terá um bom resultado. Ficaria algo assim: However, when/if fiscal elision is **praticada mediante o emprego de atos ou negócio simulados**, it can no longer be defined as elision. (porque neste caso já seria fraude) Espero que ajude! |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.