21:58 Jul 11, 2006 |
Japanese to English translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Finance (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: michiko tsum (X) Canada Local time: 14:10 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 | They were sluggish, now they are doing well |
| ||
4 | They are all doing well (first paragraph). |
| ||
3 +1 | X, Y and Z did well because of the reasons described here. |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
They were sluggish, now they are doing well Explanation: That's why they rebounded (+ the other reason they mention) - they were sluggish, so there was room for the stock to increase in value. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
They are all doing well (first paragraph). Explanation: Though I'm still wondering which paragraph you are referring to, this much I can say at this point. 東北新社(2329)、ユニ・チャーム・ペットケア(2059)、and プレステージ・インターナショナル(4290) all doing well, whereas 東北新社 who once was sluggish, now rebound. These are upper echelon of performers of the month (今月の上位貢献銘柄). Second paragraph is entirely different story. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
X, Y and Z did well because of the reasons described here. Explanation: Tohoku's stock was sluggish because of declined (earnings?) but it rebounded after the outlook for this their profit forecast and Prestiege did well, too, because of their new call center. 株価が低迷could mean whole stocks market was sluggish and it was difficult to determin. But I concluded that it is explaning Tohoku stock. Excuse my idiomatic and/or spelling mistakes. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 17 hrs (2006-07-12 15:27:19 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Oh dear. I think I accidentaly deleted several words in the second line. I had put ユニチャーム. It should go "after the outlook for this period became clear. ユニ・チャ-ム's stock did well because they announced that their profit forecast had been increased, and Prestige ... Again, sorry for the bad mistakes such as Prestiege and explaning. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.