GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
14:15 May 30, 2005 |
Japanese to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Environment & Ecology / environment | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Selected response from: KathyT Australia Local time: 15:28 | ||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | I don'y see (any) progress.... |
| ||
3 | the delay in (the establishment of pollution-containment plans and) official regulations |
|
Discussion entries: 7 | |
---|---|
・公浮フ義務付けが見送られるなど、 the delay in (the establishment of pollution-containment plans and) official regulations Explanation: Hi Flint2, My take on your phrase: (Also, factors such as) the delay in the establishment of pollution-containment plans and official regulations would indicate that measures against heavy polluters (OR 'heavily-polluting businesses) are insufficient. As for your questions: 1) As Yoshimine-san indicated, yes - this means 'delay', 'put on hold', etc. 2) I think you might be reading too much into it: The way I see it, the action/measures (against the polluters) have not been progressing sufficiently because of the delay in 2 things: (i) the delay in the formulation/establishment of plans to curb/contain the pollution, as well as (ii) the delay in some sort of 'official' mandatory regulation(s) being handed down (from the government). Hopefully you can get the general concept from my phrasing, and perhaps put it more eloquently in your own words. Good luck! Reference: http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=%22containment+plan%... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
・公浮フ義務付けが見送られるなど、 I don'y see (any) progress.... Explanation: Let me try to clear out some pints. First of all, you are right for見送られる. I think "delay" or "put off" in the context would be fine. Next, the Japanese government is the subject for排出量の多い事業者への抑制計画の策定・公浮フ義務付けが見送られる as you guess, but the subject for the rest of the sentence, 対策が助ェ進んでいるとはいえない, is I (the speaker/writer). The speaker/writer don’t see (any) progress in the environmental issues, global warming, regulation of emissions or other protection of the earth. And he or she gives you a supporting fact that his or her pint is right by saying like the government don’t make the policies or regulations efficiently regarding the issues. As KathyT pointed out some garbled characters in the sentence, I’m not confident to provide you a proper translation at the moment. Forgive me not to do it. I hope it would be helpful. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 14 hrs 3 mins (2005-05-31 04:18:31 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Sorry for a typo in the suggested answer. ¥"I don¥'y..¥" should be ¥"I don¥'t...¥" -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 5 days (2005-06-04 18:41:25 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- The government was expected to finalize a plan to regulate the heavy polluters making emission reports or record in public. But the finalizing regulations were delayed for some reasons. They’re still working on the plans. The delay was disappointing for the writer/speaker or environment activists because it would be the first and effective step (progress?) for the emission control in Japan. So the writer/speaker criticizes the inoperative action of the environmental issues. I hope it would help. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.